Jamsheed Ghorbani v. Jefferson B. Sessions III, 708 F. App'x 120 (4th Cir. 2018). · Go Syfert
Jamsheed Ghorbani v. Jefferson B. Sessions III, 708 F. App'x 120 (4th Cir. 2018). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jamsheed GHORBANI, Petitioner,
v.
Jefferson B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, Respondent
17-1406.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Jan 10, 2018.
708 F. App'x 120
Jason A. Dzubow, DZUBOW & PIL-CHER, PLLC, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Chad A. Readier, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Andrew O’Malley, Senior Litigation Counsel, Brendan P. Hogan, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Motz, Shedd, Hamilton.
Unpublished

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamsheed Ghorbani, a native and citizen of Iran, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s denial of his asylum application as time-barred. The agency granted Ghorbani’s request for withholding of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1231(b)(3) (2012).

On appeal, Ghorbani challenges the agency’s determination that he failed to establish extraordinary circumstances to excuse the untimely filing of his asylum application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(2)(B), (D) (2012). We lack jurisdiction to review this determination pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3) (2012), and find that Ghorbani does not raise a constitutional claim or question of law that would fall under the exception set forth in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D) (2012). See Mulyani v. Holder, 771 F.3d 190, 196-97 (4th Cir. 2014); Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 358-59 (4th Cir. 2009). We therefore dismiss the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DISMISSED