discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Spencer June 8, 2017); State v. Walker, 177 A.3d 1235, 1243 (Del.Super. 2018), rev’d on other grounds. 23 See Murray v. State, 45 A.3d 670, 674 (Del. 2012). 9 have been pretextual in the sense that it was not solely about a traffic violation, the Court found the stop was supported by reasonable, articulable suspicion and probable cause for a traffic violation.24 In other words, while the traffic stop might have been pretextual, the officer in this case had an objectively valid basis for believing that the driver had committed a traffic violation.

cited Cited "see, e.g." Ortiz v. Coupe (D.L. 17-1 at 61; see also Ortiz v. State, 177 A.3d 1235 (Table), 2018 WL 388642 (Del.