United States v. Joseph A. Navaro, 774 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1985). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Joseph A. Navaro, 774 F.2d 565 (2d Cir. 1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Robert Dunston v. United States (ca2, 1989-06-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Robert Dunston v. United States
2d Cir. · 1989 · confidence medium
Although this court has held that a defendant is not entitled to findings of fact under Rule 32(c)(3)(D) where a sentencing court expressly states that it did not consider the disputed materials, United States v. Navaro, 774 F.2d 565, 566 (2d Cir.1985) (per curiam), we think that the record here lacks such an express statement by the sentencing court at Dunston’s original sentencing.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Gerald John Bermingham
2d Cir. · 1988 · confidence medium
See, e.g., United States v. Romano, 825 F.2d 725, 730-31 (2d Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1573 , 99 L.Ed.2d 889 (1988); United States v. Navaro, 774 F.2d 565, 566 (2d Cir.1985) (per curiam); Ped.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Romano
unknown court · 1987 · confidence medium
Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D)(ii); United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774, 782 (2d Cir.1987); United States v. Ursillo, 786 F.2d 66, 68-69 (2d Cir.1986); United States v. Navaro, 774 F.2d 565, 566 (2d Cir.1985) (per curiam); United States v. Charmer Industries, Inc., 711 F.2d 1164, 1172 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Romano
unknown court · 1987 · confidence medium
Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D)(ii); United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774, 782 (2d Cir.1987); United States v. Ursillo, 786 F.2d 66, 68-69 (2d Cir.1986); United States v. Navaro, 774 F.2d 565, 566 (2d Cir.1985) (per curiam); United States v. Charmer Industries, Inc., 711 F.2d 1164, 1172 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Potamitis
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See United States v. Bradley, 812 F.2d 774 (2d Cir.1987); see also United States v. Navaro, 774 F.2d 565 (2d Cir.1985) (per curiam) (no violation of Rule 32(c)(3)(D) when District Court explicitly disclaimed reliance upon alleged inaccuracies in his determination of sentence to be imposed), citing United States v. Ibarra, 737 F.2d 825, 827 (9th Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Harold T. Bradley
2d Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Navaro, 774 F.2d 565 (2d Cir.1985) (per curiam) (no violation of Rule 32(c)(3)(D) when district judge explicitly disclaimed reliance upon the alleged inaccuracies in his determination of the sentence to be imposed) (citing United States v. Ibarra, 737 F.2d 825, 827 (9th Cir.1984)).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Joseph A. Navaro
235.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Oct 2, 1985.
774 F.2d 565
Published

774 F.2d 565

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Joseph A. NAVARO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 235, Docket 85-1182.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 1, 1985.
Decided Oct. 2, 1985.

Mark P. Hutchison, Elmira, N.Y., for defendant-appellant.

Jonathan W. Feldman, Asst. U.S. Atty., W.D.N.Y., Rochester, N.Y. (Salvatore R. Martoche, U.S. Atty., W.D.N.Y., Buffalo, N.Y., of counsel), for appellee.

Before LUMBARD, MANSFIELD and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

The sole issue raised on appeal is a claim that the district judge erred when he did not make findings of fact with regard to alleged inaccuracies in the presentence report. However, the district judge explicitly stated that he "did not consider [the] alleged inaccuracies" in his determination of the sentence to be imposed. He thus fully complied with the requirements of Rule 32(c)(3)(D)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and was not otherwise required to make findings with regard to the alleged inaccuracies. United States v. Ibarra, 737 F.2d 825, 827 (9th Cir.1984).

2

Affirmed.