green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Liliana Monica Craciun
Mo. 1984), aff’d without opinion 774 F.2d 1172 14 (8th Cir. 1985)). 15 In reviewing a motion for default judgment, the court may 16 consider the following factors: 17 (1) the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff; 18 (2) the merits of plaintiff’s substantive claim; 19 (3) the sufficiency of the complaint; 20 (4) the sum of money at stake in the action; 21 (5) the possibility of a dispute concerning material 22 facts; 23 (6) whether the default was due to excusable neglect; 24 and 25 (7) the strong policy underlying the Federal Rules of 26 Civil Procedure favoring decisions on the merit…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In re: Liliana Monica Craciun
Mo. 1984), aff’d without opinion 774 F.2d 1172 14 (8th Cir. 1985)). 15 In reviewing a motion for default judgment, the court may 16 consider the following factors: 17 (1) the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff; 18 (2) the merits of plaintiff’s substantive claim; 19 (3) the sufficiency of the complaint; 20 (4) the sum of money at stake in the action; 21 (5) the possibility of a dispute concerning material 22 facts; 23 (6) whether the default was due to excusable neglect; 24 and 25 (7) the strong policy underlying the Federal Rules of 26 Civil Procedure favoring decisions on the merit…
cited
Cited "see"
MBNA America Bank, N.A. v. Hostetter (In Re Hostetter)
See Peerless Industries, Inc. v. Herrin Illinois Café, Inc., 593 F.Supp. 1339, 1341 (E.D.Mo.1984), aff 'd without opinion 774 F.2d 1172 (8th Cir.1985); Wright, Miller and Kane, at § 2688.
discussed
Cited "see"
Valley Oak Credit Union v. Villegas (In Re Villegas)
(2×)
See Peerless Industries, Inc. v. Herrin Illinois Cafe, Inc., 593 F.Supp. 1339, 1341 (E.D.Mo.1984), aff'd without opinion 774 F.2d 1172 (8th Cir.1985); Wright, Miller and Kane, at § 2688.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Molasky
v.
Denos
v.
Denos
85-1664.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Sep 26, 1985.
774 F.2d 1172
Published