green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
2.9 score
“the reference to the death of the plaintiff in the pleadings is not sufficient to trigger the running of the 90 day time period.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Lightfoot v. Dc
the reference to the death of the plaintiff in the pleadings is not sufficient to trigger the running of the 90 day time period.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hawes v. Johnson & Johnson
In Blair , the Third Circuit affirmed the district court, which held that mere reference to a party’s death in either court proceedings or pleadings is insufficient to trigger the 90 day time period for filing a Rule 25(a) motion for substitution. 787 F.2d at 580; see Grandbouche v. Lovell, 913 F.2d 835, 836-37 (10th Cir.1990); Kaldawy v. Gold Serv.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Anderson
v.
Dreibelbis
v.
Dreibelbis
85-1413.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Mar 5, 1986.
787 F.2d 580
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
Anderson
v.
Dreibelbis
85-1413
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
3/5/86
E.D.Pa.,
Newcomer, J.,
AFFIRMED