Roussis (John D.) v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., Terminal Freight Handling Co., Inc., Signal Delivery Servs., Inc, 800 F.2d 1138 (3rd Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Roussis (John D.) v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc., Terminal Freight Handling Co., Inc., Signal Delivery Servs., Inc, 800 F.2d 1138 (3rd Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
26 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp. (pa, 1997-06-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Oberneder v. Link Computer Corp.
Pa. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sendi v. NCR Comten, Inc., 619 F.Supp. 1577, 1579 (E.D.Pa. 1985), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1138 (3d Cir.1986)(stating that the statute gives added protections to employees by providing a statutory remedy). [4] We therefore affirm the decision of the Superior Court.
cited Cited "see" Redick v. Kraft, Inc.
E.D. Pa. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sendi *305 v. NCR Comten, Inc., 619 F.Supp. 1577 (E.D.Pa.1985), aff'd, 800 F.2d 1138 (3d Cir.1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Roussis (John D.)
v.
Sears, Roebuck & Company, Inc., Terminal Freight Handling Company, Inc., Signal Delivery Services, Inc
85-1636.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Jun 11, 1986.
800 F.2d 1138
Published

800 F.2d 1138

Roussis (John D.)
v.
Sears, Roebuck & Company, Inc., Terminal Freight Handling
Company, Inc., Signal Delivery Services, Inc.

NO. 85-1636

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

JUN 11, 1986

Appeal From: E.D.Pa.,

Fullam, J.

1

AFFIRMED.