United States v. Harold Joseph Rosenthal, Philip Anthony Bonadonna, Robert Edward Dunleavy, Jr., George Lombardi, Garland Hubert Watson, Larry Roger Stewart, Joseph Vincent Junker, United States of Am. v. Rose Marie Junker, United States of Am. v. Dennis Wayne Wilson, 801 F.2d 378 (11th Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
United States v. Harold Joseph Rosenthal, Philip Anthony Bonadonna, Robert Edward Dunleavy, Jr., George Lombardi, Garland Hubert Watson, Larry Roger Stewart, Joseph Vincent Junker, United States of Am. v. Rose Marie Junker, United States of Am. v. Dennis Wayne Wilson, 801 F.2d 378 (11th Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
60 citation events (8 in the last 25 years) across 20 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Deaundre Lamar Cobb (ca11, 2024-08-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Deaundre Lamar Cobb
11th Cir. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1232 (11th Cir. 1986) (search of handbag), modified, 801 F.2d 378 (11th Cir. 1986); United States v. Richardson, 764 F.2d 1514, 1527 (11th Cir. 1985) (search of wallet); United States v. Sonntag, 684 F.2d 781, 786 (11th Cir. 1982) (search of wallet); United States v. Roper, 681 F.2d 1354, 1357 (11th Cir. 1982) (search of metal brief case and zippered shoulder bag), overruled on other grounds by United States v. Watkins, 10 F.4th 1179 (11th Cir. 2021) (en banc).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Johnny Jean
11th Cir. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1232 (11th Cir.1986), modified, 801 F.2d 378 (11th Cir.1986) (per curiam) (search of handbag); United States v. Richardson, 764 F.2d 1514, 1527 (11th Cir.1985) (search of wallet); United States v. Roper, 681 F.2d 1354, 1357 (11th Cir.1982) (search of briefcase and book bag).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Esparza-Ponce
S.D. Cal. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1232 (11th Cir.1986), modified on other grounds, 801 F.2d 378 (11th Cir.1986).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gonzalez
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1244 (11th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 801 F.2d 378 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Gonzalez
11th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1244 (11th Cir.), modified on other grounds, 801 F.2d 378 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Martinez
N.D. Ga. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
Therefore, as many courts have held, “it is the contracting foreign government, not the defendant, that would have the right to complain about a violation.” United States v. Cordero, 668 F.2d 32, 38 (1st Cir.1981); see also United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1232 (11th Cir.), modified in part, 801 F.2d 378 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Valot, 625 F.2d 308 (9th Cir.1980) (in response to assertion that abduction violated extradition treaty, held that individuals’ rights are only derivative through states, even when a t…
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Rene Martin Verdugo-Urquidez (4×)
9th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214, 1231 (11th Cir.), modified, 801 F.2d 378 (1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 919 , 107 S.Ct. 1377 , 94 L.Ed.2d 692 (1987); United States v. Paternina-Vergara, 749 F.2d 993, 998 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1217 , 105 S.Ct. 1197 , 84 L.Ed.2d 342 (1985); United States v. Hawkins, 661 F.2d 436, 455-56 (5th Cir. Unit B Nov. 1981); United States v. Heller, 625 F.2d 594 599-600 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Marzano, 537 F.2d 257, 269-71 (7th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1038 , 97 S.Ct. 734 , 50 L.Ed.2d 749 (1977).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Harold Joseph Rosenthal, Philip Anthony Bonadonna, Robert Edward Dunleavy, Jr., George Lombardi, Garland Hubert Watson, Larry Roger Stewart, Joseph Vincent Junker, United States of America v. Rose Marie Junker, United States of America v. Dennis Wayne Wilson
85-8108.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Sep 18, 1986.
801 F.2d 378

801 F.2d 378

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Harold Joseph ROSENTHAL, Philip Anthony Bonadonna, Robert
Edward Dunleavy, Jr., George Lombardi, Garland
Hubert Watson, Larry Roger Stewart,
Joseph Vincent Junker,
Defendants-Appellants.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Rose Marie JUNKER, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dennis Wayne WILSON, Defendant-Appellee.

Nos. 84-8969, 85-8108 and 85-8217.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 18, 1986.

Craig Gillen, Atlanta, Ga., Asst. U.S. Atty., for U.S.

R.C. Cougill, Lilburn, Ga., (Court Appointed), for Rosenthal.

Arthur W. Tifford, Miami, Fla., for Dunleavy.

Frank J. Petrella, Atlanta, Ga., for Lombardi & Bonadonna.

William T. Payne, Atlanta, Ga. (Court Appointed), for Watson.

Gil Howard, Atlanta, Ga. (Court Appointed), for Joseph V. Junker.

Bruce S. Harvey, Atlanta, Ga., for Stewart.

Howard J. Manchel, Atlanta, Ga. (Court Appointed), for Rose Marie Junker.

Paul Kehir, Snellville, Ga. (Court Appointed), for Wilson.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before GODBOLD and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS[*], Senior District Judge.

THOMAS, Senior District Judge:

MODIFIED OPINION

In our opinion United States v. Rosenthal, 793 F.2d 1214 (11th Cir.1986), Appellant Harold Rosenthal's conviction on Count Thirteen, conspiracy to import cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 963, was vacated due to said offense merging with his Sec. 848 conviction and sentence.

In his motion for modification of opinion, Appellant Bonadonna argues that his conviction for the same offense should be vacated in light of Bonadonna's adoption of the arguments asserted by his co-appellants. An examination of the record discloses that Bonadonna, with respect to his Sec. 963 conviction, is in the same posture as Rosenthal. Accordingly, Bonadonna's conviction and sentence under Count Thirteen must be, and hereby is, VACATED. United States v. Harrington, 761 F.2d 1482 (11th Cir.1985).

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTIONS FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before GODBOLD, and VANCE, Circuit Judges, and THOMAS*, Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Petitions for rehearing filed by Joseph Vincent Junker, George Lombardi, and Harold Joseph Rosenthal are DENIED. The petition for rehearing filed by Philip Anthony Bonadonna, except to the extent previously granted is DENIED. No member of this panel nor other judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Eleventh Circuit Rule 26), the suggestions for rehearing en banc filed by George Lombardi, Philip Anthony Bonadonna, Harold Joseph Rosenthal and Rose Marie Junker, are DENIED.

*

Honorable Daniel H. Thomas, Senior U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of Alabama, sitting by designation