Richardson v. Chong Sik Kim, 116 Wash. App. 1008 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Richardson v. Chong Sik Kim, 116 Wash. App. 1008 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases · …to the extent that the criminal 14 term 'extortion' sets out a civil cause of action . . . presents no evidence of 15 wrongful or oppressive conduct. ⚠ not in text
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Ocean Beauty Seafoods LLC v. Captain Alaska (wawd, 2022-05-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ocean Beauty Seafoods LLC v. Captain Alaska
W.D. Wash. · 2022 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
to the extent that the criminal 14 term 'extortion' sets out a civil cause of action . . . presents no evidence of 15 wrongful or oppressive conduct.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Ocean Beauty Seafoods LLC v. Captain Alaska
W.D. Wash. · 2022 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
to the extent that the criminal 14 term 'extortion' sets out a civil cause of action . . . presents no evidence of 15 wrongful or oppressive conduct.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wayne R. Richardson
v.
Chong Sik Kim
No. 49783-9-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington.
Mar 10, 2003.
116 Wash. App. 1008
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: #47,154 of 633,719
Citer courts: W.D. Washington (2)

Appeal from judgments of the Superior Court for King County, No. 01-2-16420-1, James A. Doerty, J., entered October 12, 2001 and January 18, 2002. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.