Eva Bowen v. Thomas F. Vivyan, Twyford & Donahey Law Firm, Michael P. Jackson, Elliott R. Good, State of Ohio, Off. of Attorney Gen., 828 F.2d 19 (6th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Eva Bowen v. Thomas F. Vivyan, Twyford & Donahey Law Firm, Michael P. Jackson, Elliott R. Good, State of Ohio, Off. of Attorney Gen., 828 F.2d 19 (6th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
35 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Nagy v. CEP America, LLC (cand, 2024-05-30)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Nagy v. CEP America, LLC
N.D. Cal. · 2024 · confidence medium
It must also “draw 18 all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Usher v. City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 19 556, 561 (9th Cir. 1987). 20 IV.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Holley v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2023 · confidence medium
E.g., Toner v. Lederle Lab’ys, 828 F.2d 19 510, 513 (9th Cir. 1987) (explaining that negligence and strict liability law “require[] the jury to 20 examine the case from two different points of view,” such that “it is reasonable” to read jury 21 verdicts finding negligence but not strict liability “as saying that” the defendant’s failure to 22 develop an allegedly safer product “was unreasonable conduct, although the danger posed by the 23 product itself was not greater than an ordinary consumer would reasonably expect”).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) (PS) Lavy v. McDonough
E.D. Cal. · 2022 · confidence medium
The court may also 18 consider facts which may be judicially noticed, Mullis v. United States Bankruptcy Ct., 828 F.2d 19 1385, 1388 (9th Cir. 1987), and matters of public record, including pleadings, orders, and other 20 papers filed with the court, Mack v. South Bay Beer Distributors, 798 F.2d 1279, 1282 (9th Cir. 21 1986).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Renati v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2019 · confidence medium
In deciding the motion to 17 dismiss, the Court “must presume all factual allegations of the complaint to be true and draw all 18 reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Usher v. City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 19 556, 561 (9th Cir. 1987). 20 “A plaintiff’s obligation to provide the grounds of his entitlement to relief requires more 21 than labels and conclusions, and a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not 22 do.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (internal quotation marks 23 omitted).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Nona-Gayle Domoracki v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
6th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
Id. at 133. 17 Claimant was examined by Dr. Shashi Vora on February 5, 1985.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Darrell Robertson v. Dennis Lanni, et al.
M.D. Tenn. · 2026 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See e.g., Celotex, 477 U.S. at 332 (Brennan, J., dissenting) (“If the moving party has not fully discharged this initial burden . . ., its motion for summary judgment must be denied, and the Court need not consider whether the moving party has met its ultimate burden of persuasion.” (quoted in Angelo v. Kroger Co., 828 F.2d 19 (6th Cir. 1987))).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eva Bowen
v.
Thomas F. Vivyan, Twyford & Donahey Law Firm, Michael P. Jackson, Elliott R. Good, State of Ohio, Office of Attorney General
87-3105.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Sep 1, 1987.
828 F.2d 19
Unpublished

828 F.2d 19

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Eva BOWEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Thomas F. VIVYAN, Twyford & Donahey Law Firm, Michael P.
Jackson, Elliott R. Good, State of Ohio, Office of
Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-3105

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

September 1, 1987.

ORDER

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES, WELLFORD and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges.

1

This pro se appellant appeals from a judgment of the district court which dismissed her civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Upon examination of the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, this panel agrees that oral argument is not needed. Rule 34(a), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

2

For the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum and order, its final judgment entered January 15, 1987, is hereby affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.