green
Positive treatment
16.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pritchett v. LaQuidara
Manzo v. Reynolds, 477 A.2d 732, 734 (Me. 1984).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Madden Realty LLC v. Boisse
Manzo v. Reynolds, 477 A.2d 732, 734 (Me. 1984).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Kiernan v. Campbell
Manzo v. Reynolds, 477 A.2d 732, 734 (Me. 1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
McCormick v. Twist Family Motors
Mr. Twist has failed to provide a transcript or statement of the evidence for the record in this case. "[W]hen a party does not furnish the Superior Court with any transcript of the evidence in the District Court, or any statement of the evidence or proceedings ... the Superior Court has no basis for reviewing the judgment of the District Court." Manzo v. Reynolds, 477 A.2d 732, 734 (Me. 1984).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Quatrano v. Hammoud
(3×)
On an appeal ina small claims matter, the Superior Court will affirm the decision of District Court unless that decision was “arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable based on the evidence presented in the whole record.” Manzo v. Reynolds, 477 A.2d 732, 733 (Me. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Manon Cote v. Roger Vallee
See Manzo v. Reynolds, 477 A.2d 732, 734 (Me. 1984) (“[W]hen a party does not furnish the Superior Court with any transcript of the evidence in the District Court, or any statement of the evidence or proceedings as would . . . be usable on appeal in lieu of a transcript, the Superior Court has no basis for reviewing the judgment of the District Court.”). [¶23] In the absence of a jury trial request or an adequate record for appellate review of a legal issue, the Superior Court had no authority to act, and it therefore should have dismissed the appeal.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hallali v. Mulkern
See Manzo v. Reynolds, 477 A.2d 732, 734 (Me. 1984) (stating that the Superior Court must deny an appeal if no record is filed to allow for fair consideration of the issues on appeal).
cited
Cited "see"
Sea View Motel, Inc. v. M. Cayouette Flooring
See Manzo v. Reynolds, 477 A.2d 732, 734 (Me.1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Maine
v.
Sharon A. KELLY
v.
Sharon A. KELLY
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
Jun 26, 1984.
Margaret Kravchuk, Dist. Atty., Gary F. Thorne (orally) Asst. Dist. Atty., Bangor, for plaintiff., Carl D. McCue (orally) Bangor, for defendant.
Glassman, McKusick, Nichols, Scolnik, Wathen.
Published
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION.
In this civil OUI case, 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-C (Supp.1983-1984), the record amply supports the District Court’s finding that the police officer had an articulable suspicion justifying his second investigative stop of defendant. See Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 21, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879-80, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968); State v. Rowe, 453 A.2d 134, 136 (Me.1982). The other issues raised by defendant merit no discussion.
The entry is:
Judgment affirmed.
All concurring.