Prof'l Investigating & Consulting Agency, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 149 A.3d 517 (Del. 2016). · Go Syfert
Prof'l Investigating & Consulting Agency, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Co., 149 A.3d 517 (Del. 2016). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Leon Gilbert v. Unisys Corporation (delch, 2024-08-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Leon Gilbert v. Unisys Corporation
Del. Ch. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See Sabree Env’t & Constr., Inc. v. Summit Dredging, LLC, 149 A.3d 517 (Del. 2016) (TABLE) (“[S]tandalone arguments in footnotes are usually not considered fairly raised in any court.”); In re Tesla Motors, Inc. S’holder Litig., 2018 WL 1560293 , at *20 (Del. 129 Pls.’ Post-Trial Reply Br. 32 n.9. 65 Ch.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sherman v. State
Del. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Adkins v. State, 149 A.3d 517 , 2016 WL 5940363, at *3 (Del. 2016) (TABLE) (“In evaluating the propriety of a jury charge, the entire instruction must be considered with no statement to be viewed in a vacuum.”) (quoting Flamer, 490 A.2d at 128 ); Ireland v. Gemcraft Hornes, Inc., 29 A.3d 246 , 2011 WL 4553166, at *3 (Del. 2011) (TABLE) (“In evaluating the propriety of a jury charge, the jury instructions must be viewed as a whole.”). reasons, justice would miscarry if it were allowed to stand.”6 The Court must defer to the jury unless “‘the evidence preponderates so heav…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
PROFESSIONAL INVESTIGATING & CONSULTING AGENCY, INC., dba PICA, Below
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, Below
No. 108, 2016.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Oct 12, 2016.
149 A.3d 517
Published

Court Below—Superior Court of the State of Delaware, C.A. No. N12C-06-196

AFFIRMED.