green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.6 score
“in determining whether to approve the trustee's application to settle a controversy, the bankruptcy court does not substitute its judgment for that of the trustee.”
Treatment trajectory · 1988 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1988
2007
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Eric Ben-Artzi
in determining whether to approve the trustee's application to settle a controversy, the bankruptcy court does not substitute its judgment for that of the trustee.
discussed
Cited "see"
Mastercraft Fabrics Corp. v. Dickson Elberton Mills Inc.
The ordinary observer test has been stated as “whether the average lay observer would recognize the alleged copy as having been appropriated from the copyrighted work,” Malden Mill, Inc. v. Regency Mills, Inc., 626 F.2d 1112, 1114 (2d Cir.1980) (quoting Ideal Toy Corp. v. Fab-Lu, Ltd., 360 F.2d 1021, 1022 (2d Cir.1966)); see Original Appalachian, 684 F.2d at 829-30, and whether “the ordinary observer, unless he set out to detect the disparities would be disposed to overlook them and regard their aesthetic appeal as the same.” In Design v. Lynch Knitting Mills, Inc., 689 F.Supp. 176, 17…
cited
Cited "see"
Ackley v. Gulf Oil Corp.
See Beime v. Getty Petroleum Corp., 707 F.Supp. 632 (E.D.N.Y.1988), aff d, per oral opinion, 863 F.2d 45 (2d Cir.1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Ashford Hotels, Ltd.
See Hill v. Burdick (In re Moorhead Corp.), 208 B.R. 87, 89 (1st Cir. BAP 1997); see also Depo v. Chase Lincoln First Bank, N.A., 77 B.R. 381, 384 (N.D.N.Y.1987), aff'd, 863 F.2d 45 (2d Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gribben v. United States (In Re Gribben)
Compare In re Depo, 77 B.R. 381, 383 (N.D.N.Y.1987), aff’d, 863 F.2d 45 (2d Cir.1988) (in dicta, debtor has no standing) with Mulligan v. Sobiech, 131 B.R. 917, 920 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (debtor, as party in interest, has standing); In re Silverman, 10 B.R. 734, 735 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y. 1981), aff’d, 37 B.R. 200 (S.D.N.Y.1982) (debtor has standing where surplus may be generated). 4 . 11 U.S.C. § 106 (a).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Jones v. CBS, INC.
See also In Design v. Lynch Knitting Mills, Inc., 689 F.Supp. 176, 179 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd without opinion, 863 F.2d 45 (2d Cir.1988).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Murray
v.
Smith
v.
Smith
86-2465.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Oct 13, 1988.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. New York (1)
Murray
v.
Smith
NO. 86-2465
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
OCT 13, 1988
1
Appeal From: E.D.N.Y.
2
AFFIRMED.