neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William R. MEEK
v.
Margaret MEEK
v.
Margaret MEEK
Claude E. Smith, Owensboro, for appellant., Louise G. Kirtley, Owensboro, for appel-lee.
Bird.
Cited by 3 opinions | Published
BIRD, Chief Justice.
William R. Meek moved for modification of a judgment concerning the maintenance and custody of infant children. The trial judge made minor modifications but overruled the major portion of the motion. He appeals.
Upon examination of the record we find that the trial judge has not abused his discretion and we therefore decline to disturb his findings. Petrie v. Petrie, Ky., 262 S.W.2d 182; Wilkey v. Glisson, Ky., 303 S.W.2d 266.
The judgment is affirmed.