Grief v. Wood, 378 S.W.2d 611 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). · Go Syfert
Grief v. Wood, 378 S.W.2d 611 (Ky. Ct. App. 1964). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Charlie Kirby v. Keeneland Association, Inc. (kyctapp, 2023-03-30)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Charlie Kirby v. Keeneland Association, Inc.
Ky. Ct. App. · 2023 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
other matters suggested in appellants' brief are unsupported by argument or by citation of authority . . . present nothing for consideration.
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Jbs Swift v. Ana Mabel Dumois Bueno
Ky. · 2021 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
other matters suggested in appellants' brief are unsupported by argument or by citation of authority . . . present nothing for consideration.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Johnson v. Commonwealth
Ky. Ct. App. · 2007 · confidence medium
Grief v. Wood, 378 S.W.2d 611, 612 (Ky.1964).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charles W. GRIEF
v.
Ben S. WOOD
Court of Appeals of Kentucky.
Apr 17, 1964.
378 S.W.2d 611
George M. Catlett, Frankfort, Robert B. Reed, Paducah, for appellants., David R. Reed, Paducah, for appellees.
Montgomery.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published
MONTGOMERY, Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment approving the action of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board in authorizing the transfer of a liquor license issued to Johnnie R. and Emma Y. McDaniel covering premises in Paducah, and ordering the issuance of a retail beer license, package liquor license, and retail drink license to Ben S. Wood for a store constructed by him on U. S. Highway 45 in Harper’s Precinct, a wet precinct in McCracken County. Appellant Charles W. Grief is the only protestant who appeared before the Board. This is a second appeal. See Durbin v. Wood, Ky., 369 S.W.2d 125.

The only question is whether the Board has authority to transfer the license from a second class city to a precinct outside the city, both being in the same county.

[*612] Appellants argue that the transfer should be denied because the City of Paducah -would lose the license fees paid under the old license. Neither the City of Paducah nor any authorized representative is a party to this action. The argument is made on the City’s behalf by a protestant who is a resident of the precinct into which the license will be moved. His solicitude for the City and its revenue problems may stem from his relationship with the appellants in the previous appeal, some of whom already have a license in Harper’s Precinct. There is no merit in this argument. KRS 243.630. Louisville Retail Package Liquor Dealers’ Association v. Shearer, 313 Ky. 316, 231 S.W.2d 47.

Other matters suggested in appellants’ brief are unsupported by argument or by citation of authority; hence, they present nothing for consideration.

Judgment affirmed.