green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
37.2 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 2007 ·
…subsequent testing cure a violation of the statute, if it could, then delays in testing would increase so bloodstream alcohol levels could deteriorate, and accurate evidence samples could no longer be obtained.
at p. 670
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
State v. Bonvie
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
subsequent testing cure a violation of the statute, if it could, then delays in testing would increase so bloodstream alcohol levels could deteriorate, and accurate evidence samples could no longer be obtained.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
State v. Bonvie
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
subsequent testing cure a violation of the statute, if it could, then delays in testing would increase so bloodstream alcohol levels could deteriorate, and accurate evidence samples could no longer be obtained.
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
State v. Bonvie
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
subsequent testing cure a violation of the statute, if it could, then delays in testing would increase so bloodstream alcohol levels could deteriorate, and accurate evidence samples could no longer be obtained.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Toby Joseph Welch v. Iowa Department of Transportation, Motor Vehicle Division
Zidell v. Bright, 264 Cal.App.2d 867 , 71 Cal. Rptr. 111, 113 (1968); Marshall v. District of Columbia, 498 A.2d 190, 192 (D.C.1985); People v. Shorkey, 23 Ill.App.3d 662 , 321 N.E.2d 46, 48 (1974); Parker v. State, 530 N.E.2d 128, 130-31 (Ind.Ct.App.1988); Humphries v. Commonwealth, 807 S.W.2d 669, 670 (Ky.Ct.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Suazo
States adopting a bright-line test include: California, Zidell v. Bright, 264 Cal.App.2d 867 , 71 Cal.Rptr. 111, 112-13 (1968); Illinois, People v. Graziano, 151 Ill.App.3d 475 , 104 Ill.Dec. 325, 328 , 502 N.E.2d 822, 825 (1986), but see People v. Naseef, 127 Ill.App.3d 70 , 82 Ill.Dec. 204, 207 , 468 N.E.2d 466, 469 (1984) (not expressly overruled by Graziano, stating that "[w]e do not believe that the legislature intended that a ‘refusal’ exist, for purposes of the statute, where a suspect initially declines to take the test but ultimately agrees to take and does complete the test”); …
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Matter of Suazo
NOTES [1] Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Wyoming. [2] States adopting a bright-line test include: California, Zidell v. Bright, 264 Cal.App.2d 867 , 71 Cal.Rptr. 111, 112-13 (1968); Illinois, People v. Graziano, 151 Ill.App.3d 475 , 104 Ill.Dec. 325, 328 , 502 N.E.2d 822, 825 (1986), but see People v. Naseef, 127 Ill.App.3d 70 , 82 Ill.Dec. 204, 207 , 468 N.E.2d 466, 469 (1984) (not expressly overruled by Graziano, stating that "[w]e do not believe that the legislature intended that a `refusal' exist, for pu…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION
v.
Thomas William GOODMAN, Jr.
v.
Thomas William GOODMAN, Jr.
No. 91-SC-031-KB.
Kentucky Supreme Court.
May 9, 1991.
Stephens.
Published
ORDER OF PUBLIC REPRIMAND
Upon motion of the Kentucky Bar Association pursuant to SCR 3.435, an Order was entered by this Court on February 14, 1991, for respondent to inform the Court and show cause on or before March 27, 1991, why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed. The response which was filed neither raised a lack of jurisdiction or fraud in the Order of the state disciplinary proceedings nor that the misconduct established warranted substantially different discipline in this state.
It is hereby ordered that respondent, Thomas William Goodman, Jr., be, and he hereby is, issued a public reprimand for misconduct and being the identical discipline imposed upon the respondent by Ordered entered December 4, 1990, by the Virginia State Bar Disciplinary Board.
ENTERED: May 9, 1991.
/s/ Robert F. Stephens Chief Justice