Richard Lee Helzer, v City of Alpena Cnty. of Alpena, a Mun. Corp. Theodore O. Johnson, Magistrate of the City & Cnty. of Alpena, 884 F.2d 579 (6th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
Richard Lee Helzer, v City of Alpena Cnty. of Alpena, a Mun. Corp. Theodore O. Johnson, Magistrate of the City & Cnty. of Alpena, 884 F.2d 579 (6th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
42 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gillard v. Mitchell (ca6, 2006-04-26)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Gillard v. Mitchell
6th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fussell v. Morris, 884 F.2d 579 , 1989 WL 100857, at *4 (6th Cir. 1989) (table).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard Lee Helzer,
v.
City of Alpena County of Alpena, a Municipal Corporation Theodore O. Johnson, Magistrate of the City and County of Alpena
89-1258.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Aug 24, 1989.
884 F.2d 579
Unpublished

884 F.2d 579

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Richard Lee HELZER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
CITY OF ALPENA; County of Alpena, a Municipal Corporation;
Theodore O. Johnson, Magistrate of the City and
County of Alpena, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-1258.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 24, 1989.

1

Before KEITH and BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judges, and JULIA S. GIBBONS, District Judge.[*]

ORDER

2

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the briefs and record, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

3

Richard Lee Helzer appeals the dismissal of his civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). Helzer alleged that the defendant state court judge issued a warrant for his arrest without probable cause. The district court concluded that the defendant judge is entitled to absolute immunity from suit for the act of issuing a warrant. On appeal, Helzer contends only that the defendant judge is entitled only to qualified immunity. Upon consideration, we conclude that the complaint was properly dismissed. Judges enjoy absolute immunity for their judicial acts. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 355-57 (1978). The issuance of an arrest warrant is such a judicial act. Foster v. Walsh, 864 F.2d 416, 417-418 (6th Cir.1988) (per curiam). Therefore, plaintiff's complaint "lacks arguable basis either in law or fact" and was properly dismissed under Sec. 1915(d). See Neitzke v. Williams, 109 U.S. 1827, 1831 (1989).

4

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Julia S. Gibbons, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation