United States v. David Butler, 884 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1989). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. David Butler, 884 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1989). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
56 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Reich v. Manganas Painting Co. (ca6, 1997-01-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1989 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1989 2007 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Reich v. Manganas Painting Co.
6th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See id.
discussed Cited "see" In Re Establishment Inspection Of Manganas Painting Company, Inc.
6th Cir. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. 14 Accordingly, we AFFIRM. 1 The Lead Exposure in Construction Interim Final Rule, 29 C.F.R. § 1926.62 , protects workers by monitoring and regulating their exposure to lead 2 Indeed, Manganas' appellate counsel conceded during oral argument that the motion to quash was moot
cited Cited "see, e.g." Lincoln Electric Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
N.D. Ohio · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Hiermer, 720 F.Supp. 1310 (S.D.Ohio 1988), aff d without op., 884 F.2d 580 (6th Cir.1989); American Ins.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Suter v. Harsco Corp. (2×)
W. Va. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Otis v. Zayre Corp., 703 F.Supp. 634, 635 (W.D.Mich.1988), aff'd without opinion, 884 F.2d 580 (6th Cir.1989). [3] Some federal courts, whose precedents are not binding because they have anticipated what the applicable state law of the forum state would be, have reached the opposite conclusion.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
David Butler
89-5238.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Aug 30, 1989.
884 F.2d 580
Unpublished

884 F.2d 580

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
David BUTLER, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 89-5238.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Aug. 30, 1989.

Before NATHANIEL JONES and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges, and RICHARD B. McQUADE, Jr., District Judge.[*]

PER CURIAM.

1

In his appeal from the judgment of conviction entered against him by the district court, defendant, David Butler, contends that the court erred in failing to suppress evidence of cocaine found on his person as the result of what he argues was an unwarranted police stop and pat-down.

2

Having throughly considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, we conclude, for the reasons set forth in the report and recommendation of the magistrate dated September 2, 1988, that the district court's ruling was not erroneous.

3

Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

*

The Honorable Richard B. McQuade, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation