M.A.G. & W.H.M. v. Adoption of J.s.m., a Child (Fla. 4th DCA 2021). · Go Syfert
Search
M.A.G. & W.H.M. v. Adoption of J.s.m., a Child (Fla. 4th DCA 2021). Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
M.A.G. and W.H.M.
v.
Adoption of J.s.m., a Child
21-2309.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Oct 6, 2021.
Published
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

IN RE THE ADOPTION OF J.S.M.

No. 4D21-2309

[October 6, 2021]

Appeal of nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Karen M. Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502021DR003042XXXXNB.

Rebecca Mercier Vargas, Jane Kreusler-Walsh, and Stephanie L. Serafin of Kreusler-Walsh, Vargas & Serafin, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Prospective Adoptive Parents M.A.G. and W.H.M.

Elizabeth R. Berkowitz, Law Office of Elizabeth R. Berkowitz, P.A., North Palm Beach, Adoption Entity, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

In this prospective adoption, the circuit court sua sponte transferred venue to Hernando County, Florida. The court determined “there is no adoption entity” and, as a result, found venue to be improper in Palm Beach County, Florida. But there is an adoption entity and venue is proper “[i]n the county where the adoption entity is located.” § 63.087(2)(a)2., Fla. Stat. (2020). Because the adoption entity is located in Palm Beach County, venue was proper in Palm Beach County, and the court’s sua sponte order transferring venue is reversed. Reversed and remanded. LEVINE, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * * Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.