Haslam v. Salt Lake City, 2015 UT App 228 (Utah Ct. App. 2015). · Go Syfert
Search
Haslam v. Salt Lake City, 2015 UT App 228 (Utah Ct. App. 2015). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: 11500 Space Center v. Private Capital Group (utahctapp, 2022-07-29)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" 11500 Space Center v. Private Capital Group
Utah Ct. App. · 2022 · signal: accord · confidence high
See Carter v. State, 2012 UT 69 , ¶ 16 n.7, 289 P.3d 542 (holding that a “court need not analyze and address in writing each and every argument, issue, or claim raised” and recognizing the “maxim of appellate review that the nature and extent of an opinion rendered by an appellate court is largely discretionary with that court” (quotation simplified)); accord Collum v. State, 2015 UT App 229, ¶ 12 , 360 P.3d 13 (per curiam). ¶63 First, Space Center argues that the district court erred when it determined that Lender was entitled to the servicing and legal fees, even if those fees did…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Adam Scott HASLAM, Appellant,
v.
SALT LAKE CITY, Appellee
20130837-CA.
Court of Appeals of Utah.
Sep 11, 2015.
2015 UT App 228
Michael P. Studebaker, Ogden, for Appellant., Padma Veeru-Collings and Steven L. Newton, Salt Lake City, for Appellee.
Voros, Roth, Pearce.
Published
PER CURIAM:

{1 Adam Scott Haslam appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-convietion relief, He argues that he is entitled to relief because Salt Lake City failed to disclose exculpatory evidence regarding arresting officer Trooper Lisa Steed's performance and disciplinary records. However, this court has recently decided issues identical to the one Haslam raises. See Monson v. Salt Lake City, 2015 UT App 136, 351 P.3d 821; Magallanes v. South Salt Lake City, 2015 UT App 154, 353 P.3d 621.

T2 This court concluded that evidence of Trooper Steed's professional misconduct was merely impeachment evidence rather than exculpatory evidence. Accordingly, the City had no obligation to disclose the evidence prior to the entry of a guilty plea. Monson, 2015 UT App 136, ¶¶ 10-11, 351 P.3d 821; see also Magallanes, 2015 UT App 154, ¶ 7, 353 621. Additionally, the Post-Conviction Remedies Act provides no relief for newly discovered impeachment evidence. See Utah Code Ann. § 78B-9-104(1)(e)(iii) (Lex-isNexis 2012). Haslam's claims are the same as those raised in Monson and Magallanes are resolved by those decisions.

T 3 Affirmed.