Fw/pbs, Inc., Etc. v. The City of Dallas, Etc., John Randall Dumas D/B/A Geno's, Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc. v. City of Dallas, Etc., Calvin Berry, III v. City of Dallas, Etc., 896 F.2d 864 (5th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Fw/pbs, Inc., Etc. v. The City of Dallas, Etc., John Randall Dumas D/B/A Geno's, Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc. v. City of Dallas, Etc., Calvin Berry, III v. City of Dallas, Etc., 896 F.2d 864 (5th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Insurance (illappct, 1994-11-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Insurance
Ill. App. Ct. · 1994 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Dayton Independent School, 682 F. Supp. at 1409-10 , rev’d on other grounds (1990), 896 F.2d 864 (applying continuous-type trigger based on the fact that "[plaintiff’s complaint asserts that [the insured’s] products were defective from the time of installation and that they released, or threatened to release, asbestos fibers into the buildings through a gradual process of deterioration, as well as through routine maintenance activities and other disturbances” and that this occurred until the products were removed or contained).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fw/pbs, Inc., Etc.
v.
The City of Dallas, Etc., John Randall Dumas D/B/A Geno's, Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc. v. City of Dallas, Etc., Calvin Berry, III v. City of Dallas, Etc.
86-1723.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 28, 1990.
896 F.2d 864
Published

896 F.2d 864

FW/PBS, INC., Etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF DALLAS, Etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.
John Randall DUMAS d/b/a Geno's, Plaintiff,
Tempo Tamers, Inc., Etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, Etc., Defendant-Appellee.
Calvin BERRY, III, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
CITY OF DALLAS, Etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-1723.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1990.

Malcolm Dade, Dallas, Tex., for FW/PBS.

Arthur M. Schwartz, Denver, Colo., for FW/PBS, et al.

Frank P. Hernandez, Dallas, Tex., for Calvin Berry, III, et al.

Richard L. Wilson, Orlando, Fla., for Tamers, et al.

David LaBrec, Office of the City Atty., Vol Villasana, Mark O'Briant, Tom Brandt, Dallas, Tex., for defendants-appellees.

Bruce A. Taylor, Phoenix, Ariz., for amicus--Citizens for Decency Through Law, Inc.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas; Jerry Buchmeyer, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before THORNBERRY, GARWOOD and HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Our decision affirming the district court has been affirmed in part, reversed in part, and vacated in part by the United States Supreme Court and remanded to this court. --- U.S. ----, 110 S.Ct. 596, 107 L.Ed.2d 603. We remand the case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the ruling of the United States Supreme Court.