discussed Cited "see" United States v. Murphy See Bertolotti v. Dugger, 883 F.2d 1503, 1528 (11th Cir.1989), reh’g denied en banc, 897 F.2d 537 (11th Cir.1990) (evidence of victim’s characteristics admissible because relevant and “of a markedly different scope and tone from the evidence condemned by the Booth Court.”) Viewed in this light, we add that, even assuming error in the admission of evidence of Petra Murphy’s character, we are satisfied beyond a reasonable doubt that the member’s deliberations were not impermissibly affected by the introduction of character evidence.

cited Cited "see, e.g." City of Chanute v. Williams Natural Gas Co. See also Royal Crown Cola Co. v. Coca-Cola Co., 887 F.2d 1480 (11th Cir.1989), reh’g denied, 897 F.2d 537 , cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1011 , 110 S.Ct. 3258 , 111 L.Ed.2d 767 (1990).