Darnell Hopewell v. Dewey Sowders, Warden Frank Deitsch Donna Dismeany, 900 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Darnell Hopewell v. Dewey Sowders, Warden Frank Deitsch Donna Dismeany, 900 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“etitioner's request for restoration of his good-time credits is prematurely raised in this habeas petition as he failed to first exhaust available state court remedies”
37 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dotson v. May (ohnd, 2024-10-17)
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Dotson v. May
N.D. Ohio · 2024 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
etitioner's request for restoration of his good-time credits is prematurely raised in this habeas petition as he failed to first exhaust available state court remedies
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Green v. Warren
E.D. Mich. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
Thus, “reference to a magistrate judge is entirely discretionary ... [and][t]he litigant has no right to a magistrate judge.” Id. at 933 ; See also Cooper v. Vidor, 1990 WL 47390, * 1 , 900 F.2d 259 (6th Cir. Apr. 16, 1990)(Table).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Darnell Hopewell
v.
Dewey Sowders, Warden Frank Deitsch Donna Dismeany
89-6138.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Apr 16, 1990.
900 F.2d 259
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 68%
Citer courts: N.D. Ohio (1)

900 F.2d 259

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Darnell HOPEWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Dewey SOWDERS, Warden; Frank Deitsch; Donna Dismeany,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 89-6138.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 16, 1990.

Before KEITH and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and CONTIE, Senior Circuit Judge.

ORDER

1

Darnell Hopewell, a Kentucky prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the order of the district court awarding summary judgment in favor of defendants.

2

This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and the briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

3

Hopewell brought suit under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against the warden and two food service employees of Northpoint Training Center. Hopewell, a professed Muslim, alleged that his first, fifth, eighth and fourteenth amendment rights were violated by the defendants providing inadequate notice of when pork was being included in the menu.

4

Upon review, we find no error. Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the magistrate's report and recommendation dated July 31, 1989, as adopted by the district court in its memorandum and order dated August 25, 1989, we hereby affirm the award of summary judgment in favor of defendants. Rule 9(b)(5), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.