Kenneth Morrison v. Gary T. Dixon Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney Gen. of the State of North Carolina, 902 F.2d 29 (4th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Kenneth Morrison v. Gary T. Dixon Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney Gen. of the State of North Carolina, 902 F.2d 29 (4th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
28 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990 2008 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kenneth Morrison
v.
Gary T. Dixon Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina
89-7790.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 17, 1990.
902 F.2d 29
Unpublished

902 F.2d 29
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kenneth MORRISON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Gary T. DIXON; Lacy H. Thornburg, Attorney General of the
State of North Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 89-7790.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 13, 1990.
Decided April 17, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Eugene A. Gordon, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 88-1087-D)

Kenneth Morrison, appellant pro se.

Richard Norwood League, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, N.C., for appellees.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, K.K. HALL and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Kenneth Morrison seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Morrison v. Dixon, C/A No. 88-1087-D (M.D.N.C. Aug. 29, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED