Timothy Hammer v. Charles Gross Armando Zatarain Newport Beach City, Linda Delapena, Timothy Hammer v. Charles Gross Armando Zatarain Newport Beach City, Linda Delapena, 902 F.2d 774 (9th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
Timothy Hammer v. Charles Gross Armando Zatarain Newport Beach City, Linda Delapena, Timothy Hammer v. Charles Gross Armando Zatarain Newport Beach City, Linda Delapena, 902 F.2d 774 (9th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“he full faith and credit clause does not apply to successive actions in federal courts . . . .”
13 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Czajka v. Holt Graphic Arts, Inc. (dc, 2022-11-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Czajka v. Holt Graphic Arts, Inc.
D.C. · 2022 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
he full faith and credit clause does not apply to successive actions in federal courts . . . .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Great Southern Company Great Entertainment Merchandise, Incorporated v. Lance Davis Too Much Fun, Incorporated D/B/A Mayhem
9th Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
Adriana Int'l Corp., 913 F.2d at 1417; Harrah's Club v. Van Blitter, 902 F.2d 774, 777 (9th Cir.1990).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Procare Laboratories, Inc. An Arizona Corporation v. Gull Laboratories, Inc., a Utah Corporation
9th Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
Corp. v. Thoeren, 913 F.2d 1406 , 1417 (9th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1109 (1991); Harrah's Club v. Van Blitter, 902 F.2d 774, 777 (9th Cir.1990).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp. John L. Friend
9th Cir. · 1994 · confidence medium
"A frivolous appeal is defined as one in which the result is obvious, or where the appellants' claims are utterly meritless." Harrah's Club v. Van Blitter, 902 F.2d 774, 777 (9th Cir.1990).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Metropolitan Creditors Service v. Sadri (2×) also: Cited "see"
Cal. Ct. App. · 1993 · confidence medium
(Harrah's Club v. Van Blitter, supra, 902 F.2d at p. 777; see also Hilton Intern.
discussed Cited "see" Whyte Monkee Productions LLC v. Netflix, Inc.
N.D. Cal. · 2024 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. 11 “Although the Full Faith and Credit Clause does not apply to successive actions in federal 12 courts … the underlying principle of that clause does apply through the doctrine of res judicata.” 13 Harrah’s Club v. Van Blitter, 902 F.2d 774, 777 (9th Cir. 1990).
cited Cited "see" Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City, a Virginia Corporation
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Harrah’s Club v. Van Blitter, 902 F.2d 774, 777 (9th *596 Cir.1990) (imposing sanctions in the form of double costs and attorney’s fees where appellant’s claim was “utterly meritless”).
discussed Cited "see" Ingle v. Circuit City
9th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Har- rah’s Club v. Van Blitter, 902 F.2d 774, 777 (9th Cir. 1990) (imposing sanctions in the form of double costs and attorney’s fees where appellant’s claim was “utterly meritless”).
discussed Cited "see" Kelly v. First Astri Corp.
Cal. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
(Rest.2d, Conf. of Laws, § 90; see Harrah’s Club v. Van Blitter (9th Cir. 1990) 902 F.2d 774, 777 .)” (Metropolitan Creditors Service v. Sadri (1993) 15 Cal.App.4th 1821, 1824-1825 [ 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 646 ] (Metropolitan).) Here, Kelly’s action does not seek enforcement of a “sister state” judgment.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Timothy Hammer
v.
Charles Gross Armando Zatarain Newport Beach City, Linda Delapena, Timothy Hammer v. Charles Gross Armando Zatarain Newport Beach City, Linda Delapena
88-5638.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
May 16, 1990.
902 F.2d 774
Published

902 F.2d 774

Timothy HAMMER, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles GROSS; Armando Zatarain; Newport Beach City,
Defendants-Appellants.
Linda Delapena, et al., Defendant.
Timothy HAMMER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Charles GROSS; Armando Zatarain; Newport Beach City, Linda
Delapena, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 87-6682, 88-5638.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 16, 1990.

Prior Report: 884 F.2d 1200.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.