United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-Barraza, 909 F.2d 1370 (9th Cir. 1990). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-Barraza, 909 F.2d 1370 (9th Cir. 1990). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
16 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Craig Hoyungowa (ca9, 1991-04-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Craig Hoyungowa
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lira-Barraza, 897 F.2d 981 , reh’g granted en banc, 909 F.2d 1370 (9th Cir.1990).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Leon Brady (2×)
9th Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Lira-Barraza, 897 F.2d 981 (9th Cir.) (departure must satisfy five step analysis), reh'g granted en banc, 909 F.2d 1370 (1990).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Larry Richard Chester, A/K/A Kevin Larry John, A/K/A Chester Parker, A/K/A Larry Parker
4th Cir. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also United States v. Lira-Barraza, 897 F.2d 981, 983-83 (9th Cir.1990), reh’g granted, 909 F.2d 1370 (1990); United States v. Rodriquez-Castro, 908 F.2d 438 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Pearson, 911 F.2d 186 (9th Cir.1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jose Jesus LIRA-BARRAZA, Defendant-Appellant
88-5161.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 14, 1990.
909 F.2d 1370
Goodwin, Browning, Wallace, Hug, Schroeder, Fletcher, Farris, Pregerson, Alarcon, Poole, Nelson, Canby, Norris, Reinhardt, Beezer, Hall, Wiggins, Brunetti, Kozinski, Noonan, Thompson, O'Scannlain, Leavy, Trott, Fernandez, Rymer.
Cited by 16 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

Prior report: 9th Cir., 897 F.2d 981.

Before GOODWIN, Chief Judge, BROWNING, WALLACE, HUG, TANG SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.