Gotay v. Breitbart, 912 N.E.2d 1056 (NY 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
Gotay v. Breitbart, 912 N.E.2d 1056 (NY 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bernadette Gotay
v.
David Breitbart, and Michael Handwerker
New York Court of Appeals.
Jun 25, 2009.
912 N.E.2d 1056
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Furman Kornfeld & Brennan LLP, New York City (A. Michael Furman of counsel), for Michael Handwerker, appellant., Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York City (Patrick J. Lawless and Richard E. Lerner of counsel), for Handwerker Honschke and Marchelos and others, appellants., Gerald J. Mondora, Rye Brook, for respondent.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, with costs, motions for summary judgment by defendants-appellants granted and certified question answered in the negative. Plaintiffs legal malpractice claim was not brought within the applicable statute of limitations period, and defendants-appellants established as a matter of law that the continuous representation doctrine does not apply.

Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.