green
Positive treatment
28.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Fordel Marketing, LLC v. Melon Corp., Ranjodh Billan, Gurdeep Billan, and Raipur Dabba Trust – Ranjodh Billan
Power Coop. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir. 1991)). “[I]t is plain that something more than an economic interest is necessary.” New Orleans Pub.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
State Of Texas v. United States Department of Homeland Security
Power Co-op., Inc. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir. 1991)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
U.S. Bank Trust National Association v. Kingman Holdings, LLC
Power Coop., Inc. v. Gulf States Utils., 940 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir. 1991) (quoting Bush v. Viterna, 740 F.2d 350, 355 (5th Cir. 1984)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Gulf Island Shipyards, LLC v. LaShip, LLC
Power Co-op. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir.1991)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Robinson v. Ardoin
Power Co-op., Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir. 1991) (quoting Bush v. Viterna, 740 F.2d 350, 355 (5th Cir.1984)). seeking intervention has the same ultimate objective as a party to the suit, a presumption arises that its interests are adequately represented, against which the petitioner must demonstrate adversity of interest, collusion, or nonfeasance.’”15 B.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
National Horsemen's Benevolent and Protective Association v. Black
Power Coop. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir. 1991)). iii.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
LED Wafer Solutions LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Power Co-op., Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir. 1991).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hoffman v. Jindal
Power Co-op., Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir. 1991). (quoting Bush v. Viterna, 740 F.2d 350, 355 (5th Cir.1984)). 59 Bush v. Viterna, 740 F.2d 350, 355 (5th Cir. 1984). 67120 representation of the State’s interest, the AG bafflingly avers that “[t]he Department has is not in agreement not to extend the stay [sic].” Later, he adds the conclusory statement that “[t]he Department and the State as a whole have different interests.”60 This is an odd statement in light of the Attorney General’s claimed interest in seeing state laws “faithfully carried o…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sethi Petroleum LLC
(2×)
Power Co-op., Inc. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir. 1991) (quoting New Orleans Pub.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Buchanan v. Sirius XM Radio Inc
Power Coop., Inc. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir. 1991)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hanover Insurance Co. v. Superior Labor Services, Inc.
Power Co-op. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir.1991)). .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State of Texas v. USA
Power Coop., Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir.1991) (internal quotation marks omitted); see Veasey v. Perry, 577 Fed.Appx. 261, 263 (5th Cir.2014) (“[T]his requirement must have some teeth.”).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Lease Oil Antitrust Litigation
Power Coop. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir.1991) (quoting New Orleans Pub.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Poynor v. Chesapeake Exploration Ltd. Partnership
Power Coop. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir.1991) (quoting New Orleans Pub.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chambers Medical Foundation v. Chambers
Power Co-op., Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc. 940 F.2d 117, 120-121 (5th Cir.1991)(intervention denied where intervenor brought no unique arguments and the principles of contract interpretation would yield the same result, regardless of the intervention).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Staley v. Harris County Texas
Power Coop., Inc. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 121 (5th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
SEC v. Funding Resource
Power Coop., Inc. v. Gulf States Util., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 121 (5th Cir. 1991).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Cook v. Powell Buick, Inc.
Power Co-op., Inc. v. Gulf States Utilities, Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 120 (5th Cir.1991)). 13 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Swann v. City of Dallas
(2×)
Power Co-op. v. Gulf States Utilities, 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir.1991).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Edwards v. City of Houston
Power Coop. v. Gulf States Utils., Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 121 (5th Cir.1991); United States v. Texas E.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Union Electric Co.
Power Co-op. v. Gulf States Utils., 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir.1991) (quoting New Orleans Pub.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Union Electric Co.
Power Co-op. v. Gulf States Utils., 940 F.2d 117, 119 (5th Cir.1991) (quoting New Orleans Pub.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Ceres Gulf and Esis/ina v. Cleaster Cooper, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs (u.s. Department of Labor), Intervenor-Appellant
Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 118-19 (5th Cir.1991). 6 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
CERES GULF and ESIS/INA v. CLEASTER COOPER
Inc., 940 F.2d 117, 118-19 (5th Cir. 1991). 4 lacked subject matter jurisdiction.6 We opt to first address intervention.7 A. Intervention of right, unless conferred unconditionally by a federal statute, Fed.
cited
Cited "see"
In re: Toyota Hybrid Brake Litigation
See Cajun Elec., 940 F.2d at 119 (quoting NOPSI III, 732 F.2d at 464).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wagner v. McDermott, Inc.
See also Domingue v. Ocean Drilling and Exploration Company, 923 F.2d 393 (5th Cir.) reh’g denied, 940 F.2d 117 (1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1033 , 112 S.Ct. 874 , 116 L.Ed.2d 779 (1992); Hollier v. Union Texas Petroleum Corporation, 972 F.2d 662 (5th Cir.1992); Dupre v. Penrod Drilling Corporation, 993 F.2d 474 (5th Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ronald J. DOMINGUE, Et Al., Plaintiffs,
v.
OCEAN DRILLING AND EXPLORATION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, v. DIMENSIONAL OIL FIELD SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellant
v.
OCEAN DRILLING AND EXPLORATION COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee, v. DIMENSIONAL OIL FIELD SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellant
90-4083.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Aug 9, 1991.
Hal J. Broussard, Susan A. Daigle, Broussard, David & Diagle, Lafayette, La., for defendant-appellant., Timothy P. Hurley, Michael J. Maginnis, Maginnis & Picou, New Orleans, La., for defendant-appellee.
Brown, Politz, Johnson.
Published
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING * EN BANC
Before BROWN, POLITZ, and JOHNSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:In its petition for rehearing, Ocean Drilling and Exploration Company (ODECO) suggests that we “misapprehended the facts” in the case upon which we rely, Davis & Sons, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corp., 919 F.2d 313 (5th Cir.1990), “incorrectly interpreting that the [Davis] barge, Barge No. 11171 was ‘supplied’ with the services in question[,]” when it was in fact a Gulf barge. In Davis the Court found the contract to be maritime based on several factors. Prior to discussing the various factors as they apply to the instant case, we stated that Domingue was distinct from Davis in part because Dimensional “supplies no vessel as such when executing an ODECO work order.” Domingue, 923 F.2d 393, 395 (5th Cir.1991). ODECO appears to be correct in its assertion that the Davis barge was not supplied by the contractor but was a Gulf barge. This error does not change our analysis or result, however.
Except as herein granted, the petition for rehearing is DENIED, and no member of this panel nor judge in regular active service having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc (F.R.App.P. 35 and Fifth Cir.Loe.R. 35), the suggestion for rehearing en banc is DENIED.