Prinz v. Fey, 189 N.E.2d 503 (NY 1963). · Go Syfert
Search
Prinz v. Fey, 189 N.E.2d 503 (NY 1963). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of the Claim of Elmo Prinz
v.
Harold Fey, Jr., Doing Business as Harold Fey, Jr., Landscaping Service, Workmen's Compensation Board
New York Court of Appeals.
Feb 21, 1963.
189 N.E.2d 503
John H. Roberts and William P. Hastorf for appellants., Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Harry Rackow, Paxton Rlair and Roy Wiedersum of counsel), for Workmen’s Compensation Board, respondent., No appearance for claimant-respondent.
Published

Order affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.