Jerome Julius Brown v. O.J. Garland, Dir., Cent. State Hosp., 944 F.2d 900 (4th Cir. 1991). · Go Syfert
Search
Jerome Julius Brown v. O.J. Garland, Dir., Cent. State Hosp., 944 F.2d 900 (4th Cir. 1991). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clark v. Benton (vaed, 2021-04-29) · Strongest negative: Jordan v. Department of the Army (vaed, 2019-10-28)
Treatment trajectory · 1991 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1991 2008 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Jordan v. Department of the Army
E.D. Va. · 2019 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Archuleta v. Sullivan, 944 F.2d 900 , at *2 (4th Cir. 1991) (Table) (describing the Fourth Circuit’s action on the case as “recalling the grant of rehearing and leaving the panel’s decision intact.”).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Clark v. Benton
E.D. Va. · 2021 · signal: see also · confidence low
See id.; see also Archuleta v. Sullivan, 944 F.2d 900 (Table), 1991 WL 179071, at *2 (4th Cir. 1991) (discussing the record review standard under § 7703); Butler v. West, 164 F.3d 634 , 639 n.10 (D.C.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jerome Julius Brown
v.
O.J. Garland, Director, Central State Hospital
91-6067.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 20, 1991.
944 F.2d 900
Unpublished

944 F.2d 900

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jerome Julius BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
O.J. GARLAND, Director, Central State Hospital, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-6067.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 1991.
Decided Sept. 20, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CA-90-1918-N)

Jerome Julius Brown, appellant pro se.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Jerome Julius Brown appeals the district court's order dismissing this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to demonstrate administrative exhaustion. Acting pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, the district court ordered appellant to exhaust administrative remedies and to advise the court within 100 days of the result of the administrative proceedings. It warned appellant that failure to advise the court regarding exhaustion would result in dismissal of the action. The district court dismissed the case without prejudice upon expiration of the 100-day period, appellant not having complied with its order.

2

The district court could properly require exhaustion of administrative remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Its dismissal of the action, without prejudice, when appellant failed to comply with its order was not an abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the judgment below. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

AFFIRMED.