People v. Velazquez, 534 N.E.2d 29 (NY 1988). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Velazquez, 534 N.E.2d 29 (NY 1988). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2002 · …e are bound to accept the trial court's findings of fact if they are supported by competent, credible evidence. at p. 30 ⚠ not in text
10 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commonwealth v. Reppert (pasuperct, 2002-12-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) Commonwealth v. Reppert (4×) also: Cited as authority (quoted), Cited as authority (rule)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2002 · quote attribution · 3 verbatim quotes · confidence high
e are bound to accept the trial court's findings of fact if they are supported by competent, credible evidence.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
David Velazquez
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 15, 1988.
534 N.E.2d 29
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Lynn A. Dummett and Pamela K. Phillips for appellant., Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney (David I. Futter and Donald J. Siewert of counsel), for respondent.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 72%
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (2)

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The undisturbed factual finding regarding propriety of the denial of defendant's suppression motion is supported by the record and therefore beyond further review. The Appellate Division having decided the suppression issue, we do not pass on the validity of defendant’s waiver. Defendant’s remaining arguments are without merit or unpreserved.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.