neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
0.2 score
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Pollard
v.
Southern Railway Company
v.
Southern Railway Company
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Oct 14, 1910.
A. 11. Davis, for plaintiff., McDaniel, Alston & Blade, Bdgar A. Neely, for defendant.
Hill.
which required the combined efforts of two men. Plaintiff
Hill, C. J.
The allegations of the petition bring this ease squarely within the decisions of this court in Whitfield v. L. & N. R. Co., 7 Ga. App. 268, 271 (66 S. E. 973), and Ayers v. L. & N. R. Co., 5 Ga. App. 454 (63 S. E. 530), and are directly covered by the decisions of the Supreme Court in Worlds v. Georgia R. Co., 99 Ga. 283 (25 S. E. 646), and Freeman v. Savannah Electric Co., 130 Ga. 449 (60 S. E. 1042). The petition was properly dismissed on demurrer, as no cause of action was shown by its allegations. Judgment affirmed.
A. 11. Davis, for plaintiff. McDaniel, Alston & Blade, Bdgar A. Neely, for defendant.