Ray Bell Johnson v. Dewey Sowders, 956 F.2d 1164 (6th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Ray Bell Johnson v. Dewey Sowders, 956 F.2d 1164 (6th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case · “Enforcement of the injunction through a contempt proceeding must occur in the issuing jurisdiction”
45 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Willard v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ohsd, 2020-06-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Willard v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
S.D. Ohio · 2020 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
enforcement of the injunction through a contempt proceeding must occur in the issuing jurisdiction
discussed Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Salena Kolarich
6th Cir. · 2022 · confidence medium
Any remaining objections about the witnesses’ “minimal contact[s],” motives for testifying, and “exposure to [Carey’s] voice, go[] to the weight, not the admissibility of the evidence.” United States v. Branch, 956 F.2d 1164, 1164 (6th Cir. 1992) (per curiam) (unpublished table decision).
cited Cited "see" Ma Leonor Mora-Mejia v. Field Office Director of Enforcement and Removal Operations, Detroit Field Office, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, et al.
N.D. Ohio · 2026 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bedel v. Thompson, 956 F.2d 1164, 1992 WL 44883, at *4 (6th Cir. 1992).
discussed Cited "see" Willard v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction
S.D. Ohio · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bedel v. Thompson, 956 F.2d 1164 , 10 1992 WL 44883 , at *4 (6th Cir. Mar. 4, 1992) (table opinion) (“Enforcement of [an order] through a contempt proceeding must occur in the issuing jurisdiction because contempt is an affront to the court issuing the order.” (citing Leman v. Krentler–Arnold Hinge Last Co., 284 U.S. 448, 452 (1932)); Waffenschmidt v. MacKay, 763 F.2d 711, 716 (5th Cir. 1985) (“Enforcement of an injunction through a contempt proceeding must occur in the issuing jurisdiction because contempt is an affront to the court issuing the order.”) (citations omitted).
cited Cited "see" Beiter v. Chase Home Finance, LLC (In re Beiter)
Bankr. S.D. Ohio · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bedel v. Thompson, 956 F.2d 1164 , 1992 WL 44883 , *4 (6th Cir. March 4, 1992).
cited Cited "see" Forson v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC (In re Forson)
Bankr. S.D. Ohio · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bedel v. Thompson, 956 F.2d 1164 , 1992 WL 44883 , *4 (6th Cir. March 4, 1992).
discussed Cited "see" King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Ass'n v. Blackwell
S.D. Ohio · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bedel v. Thompson, 956 F.2d 1164 , 1992 WL 44883 , at *4 (6th Cir. Mar.4, 1992) (holding that “[a] court has the inherent authority to enforce its own injunctive decree” and that “[t]he mandate of an injunction issued by a federal district court runs throughout the entire nation.”); Leman v. Krentler-Arnold Hinge Last Co., 284 U.S. 448, 451 , 52 S.Ct. 238 , 76 L.Ed. 389 (1932).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Verran v. United States
E.D. Mich. · 2004 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Nesbary v. Gerber Products Co., 956 F.2d 1164 , 1992 WL 42350 , at *2 (6th Cir. Mar.3, 1992); Sanders v. Southwest Airlines Co., *771 86 F.Supp.2d 739, 746 (E.D.Mich.2000); Isely v. Capuchin Province, 880 F.Supp. 1138,1146 (E.D.Mich.1995).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Campana v. Pilavis (In Re Pilavis)
Bankr. D. Mass. · 1999 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Luper v. Langley (In re Lee Way Holding Co.), 115 B.R. 586 (S.D.Ohio 1990), rev'd on other grounds, 956 F.2d 1164 (6th Cir.1992); Roth v. Iacovelli (In re Southeast Connectors, Inc.), 113 B.R. 85 (S.D.Fla.1990).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ray Bell Johnson
v.
Dewey Sowders
91-5926.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Feb 13, 1992.
956 F.2d 1164
Unpublished
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 78%
Citer courts: S.D. Ohio (1)

956 F.2d 1164

NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
Ray Bell JOHNSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Dewey SOWDERS, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 91-5926.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Feb. 13, 1992.

1

Before KEITH and BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr. Circuit Judges, and BELL, District Judge.[*]

ORDER

2

Ray Bell Johnson, a pro se Kentucky prisoner, appeals the district court's order dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a).

3

Petitioner is serving a total sentence of 40 years on the following convictions: armed robbery, bond jumping, criminal possession of a forged instrument second degree (three counts), forgery second degree, possession of stolen mail matter, theft by unlawful taking over $100, escape second degree, for being a second degree persistent felony offender (three counts), and for being a first degree persistent felony offender. Johnson does not challenge his convictions, but alleges that he is being unlawfully confined because his parole eligibility date has been incorrectly calculated.

4

Because the issue raised by Johnson is a matter of state law, his claim is not cognizable in a federal habeas corpus proceeding. See Olsen v. McFaul, 843 F.2d 918, 933 (6th Cir.1988); Martin v. Solem, 801 F.2d 324, 331 (8th Cir.1986).

5

Accordingly, the district court's judgment is hereby affirmed pursuant to Rule 9(b)(3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

*

The Honorable Robert Holmes Bell, U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation