Camellia A. Blackwell v. Prince George's Cmty. Coll. Robert I. Bickford, President Bd. of Trs., 960 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Camellia A. Blackwell v. Prince George's Cmty. Coll. Robert I. Bickford, President Bd. of Trs., 960 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
29 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Camellia A. Blackwell
v.
Prince George's Community College Robert I. Bickford, President Board of Trustees
92-1028.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Apr 17, 1992.
960 F.2d 145
Unpublished

960 F.2d 145

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Camellia A. BLACKWELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PRINCE GEORGE'S COMMUNITY COLLEGE; Robert I. Bickford,
President; Board of Trustees, Defendants-Appellees.

92-1028.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: April 6, 1992

April 17, 1992

Camellia A. Blackwell, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Ellis Bers, Anthony Victor Teelucksingh, WHITEFORD, TAYLOR & PRESTON, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Camellia A. Blackwell appeals the district court's order denying her Motion to Amend a Complaint. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.s 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

Therefore, we grant Appellees' motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED