Amerelay, Inc. v. Directomat, Inc., 8 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959). · Go Syfert
Search
Amerelay, Inc. v. Directomat, Inc., 8 A.D.2d 698 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Riko Enterprises, Inc. v. Seattle Supersonics Corp. (nysd, 1973-04-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Riko Enterprises, Inc. v. Seattle Supersonics Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1973 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e. g., Grayson-Robinson Stores, Inc. v. Iris Construction Corp., 7 A.D.2d 367 , 183 N.Y.S.2d 695 , appeal denied, 8 A.D.2d 698 , 185 N.Y.S.2d 746 (1959), affirmed, 8 N.Y.2d 133 , 202 N.Y.S.2d 203 , 168 N. E.2d 377 (1960).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Amerelay, Inc.
v.
Directomat, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
May 7, 1959.
8 A.D.2d 698
Published

Motion for leave to reargue or for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Valente and McNally, JJ.