Priscilla Penne Waugh v. Larry Campbell, Jail Adm'r Iredell Cnty. Jail, 977 F.2d 575 (4th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
Search
Priscilla Penne Waugh v. Larry Campbell, Jail Adm'r Iredell Cnty. Jail, 977 F.2d 575 (4th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Jackson v. United States (mdd, 2006-12-27)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Jackson v. United States
D. Maryland · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Williams, 977 F.2d 575 , at *4 (4th Cir.1992) (unpublished). d.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. McFarland (Concurrence)
Conn. · 2025 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Wood, Docket Nos. 91-5186 and 92-5010, 1992 WL 301975 , *1 (4th Cir. October 21, 1992) (decision without published opinion, 977 F.2d 575 ) (under balancing test, ‘‘a determination of whether such a delay has denied due process necessitates a case-by-case inquiry’’).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Priscilla Penne Waugh
v.
Larry Campbell, Jail Administrator Iredell County Jail
92-6498.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 28, 1992.
977 F.2d 575
Unpublished

977 F.2d 575

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Priscilla Penne WAUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Larry CAMPBELL, Jail Administrator; Iredell County Jail,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 92-6498.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 21, 1992.
Decided Sept. 28, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville, No. CA-91-66-ST-C-MU; Graham C. Mullen, District Judge.

Priscilla Penne Waugh, appellant pro se.

Allan R. Gitter, Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, N.C., for appellees.

W.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Priscilla Penne Waugh appeals an order denying appellant's request for certification of an interlocutory appeal. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

3

DISMISSED.