United States v. Conrod, 983 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1992). · Go Syfert
United States v. Conrod, 983 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1992). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
67 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: De La Rosa v. U.S. Attorney General (ca11, 2009-08-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1992 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1992 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" De La Rosa v. U.S. Attorney General
11th Cir. · 2009 · signal: see · confidence high
See Matter of Hernandez-Casillas, 20 I. & N. Dec. 262, 280-93 (BIA 1990), aff'd mem., 983 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1993).
examined Cited "see" Alan Farquharson v. U.S. Attorney General, Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondents- Alan Farquharson v. U.S. Attorney General, John Ashcroft, District Director for the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Robert Wallis (3×)
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Hernandez-Casillas, 20 I. & N. Dec. 262, 280-93 (BIA 1991), aff'd mem., 983 F.2d 231 (5th Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" Alan Farquharson v. U.S. Attorney General
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Hernandez- Casillas, 20 I. & N. Dec. 262, 280-93 (BIA 1991), aff’d mem., 983 F.2d 231 (5th Cir. 1993).
cited Cited "see" Alan Farquharson v. U.S. Attorney General
11th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Hernandez-Casillas, 20 I. & N. Dec. 262, 280-93 , 1990 WL 385764 (BIA 1991), aff'd mem., 983 F.2d 231 (5th Cir.1993).
cited Cited "see" Luis Alberto Bedoya-Valencia v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
2d Cir. · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hernandez-Casillas v. INS, 983 F.2d 231 (5th Cir.1993) (mem.).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States
v.
Conrod
91-1811.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Dec 28, 1992.
983 F.2d 231
Published

983 F.2d 231

U.S.
v.
Conrod[*]

NO. 91-1811

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Dec 28, 1992

Appeal From: N.D.Miss.

VACATED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2