green
Positive treatment
0.8 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Backer v. Lewit
While the parol evidence rule has no application to a subsequent agreement or subsequent oral modification of a written contract (Haight v Cohen, 123 App Div 707 ; see also, Local 50, Bakery, Confectionery & Tobacco Workers Union v American Bakeries Co., 73 AD2d 862 ) which is supported by new consideration (Haight v Cohen, supra, at 708 ), 2 the record is devoid of any showing that the oral promise upon which plaintiff relies was a subsequent agreement.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
James Price
v.
James Price
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jan 8, 1980.
Published
— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered on April 4, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See Anders v California, 386 US 738;[*863] People v Saunders, 52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur — Fein, J. P., Bloom, Silverman, Ross and Yesawich, JJ.