People v. Santiago, 101 A.D.3d 1155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Santiago, 101 A.D.3d 1155 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: People v. Barrett (nyappdiv, 2013-04-10)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) People v. Barrett
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for youthful offender treatment (see CPL 720.20 [1]; People v Santiago, 101 AD3d 1155, 1155 [2012]).
cited Cited as authority (rule) People v. Barrett
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for youthful offender treatment (see CPL 720.20 [1]; People v Santiago, 101 AD3d 1155, 1155 [2012]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Jon Santiago
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 26, 2012.
101 A.D.3d 1155
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Contrary to the People’s contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Wright, 89 AD3d 874, 874-875 [2011]).

However, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request for youthful offender treatment (see CPL 720.20 [1]). Moreover, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Roman and Sgroi, JJ., concur.