People v. Smith, 101 A.D.3d 1156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Smith, 101 A.D.3d 1156 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (11 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: People v. Mazariego (nyappdiv, 2014-05-28)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Mazariego
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · confidence medium
In addition, the defendant was not deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counsel, as counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 565-566 [2000]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; People v Walston, 101 AD3d 1156, 1156-1157 [2012]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Mazariego
N.Y. App. Div. · 2014 · confidence medium
In addition, the defendant was not deprived of his right to the effective assistance of counsel, as counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v Henry, 95 NY2d 563, 565-566 [2000]; People v Benevento, 91 NY2d 708, 712 [1998]; People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]; People v Walston, 101 AD3d 1156, 1156-1157 [2012]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Collins
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court violated CPL 310.30 and deprived him of a fair trial by failing to meaningfully respond to a certain jury note is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Ramirez, 15 NY3d 824, 825 [2010]; People v Starling, 85 NY2d 509, 516 [1995]; People v Walston, 101 AD3d 1156, 1157 [2012]; People v Battle, 15 AD3d 413, 414 [2005]).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) People v. Collins
N.Y. App. Div. · 2013 · confidence medium
The defendant’s contention that the Supreme Court violated CPL 310.30 and deprived him of a fair trial by failing to meaningfully respond to a certain jury note is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Ramirez, 15 NY3d 824, 825 [2010]; People v Starling, 85 NY2d 509, 516 [1995]; People v Walston, 101 AD3d 1156, 1157 [2012]; People v Battle, 15 AD3d 413, 414 [2005]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York
v.
Robert D. Smith
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Dec 26, 2012.
101 A.D.3d 1156
Published

The defendant has not established his entitlement to the relief requested (see People v Syville, 15 NY3d 391 [2010]). Skelos, J.P., Hall, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.