TCC Air Servs., Inc. v. Richard M. Schlesinger, 278 F. App'x 923 (11th Cir. 2008). · Go Syfert
TCC Air Servs., Inc. v. Richard M. Schlesinger, 278 F. App'x 923 (11th Cir. 2008). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
TCC AIRSERVICES, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Basic Systems of Delaware, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Richard SCHLESINGER, Defendant-Appellant
07-10729.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
May 20, 2008.
278 F. App'x 923
William H. Pincus, Guy Carman Icangelo, Jr., Law Offices of William H. Pincus, West Palm Beach, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.
Anderson, Hull, Per Curiam, Siler.
Unpublished
PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed. We believe that the instant situation is probably within the contemplation of 14 C.F.R. § 91.501(b)(5), which indicates that charges not in excess of the cost of owning, operating and maintaining the airplane may be made when the situation involves carriage of guests of a company when the carriage is within the scope of, and incidental to, the business of the company (other than transportation by air). Schlesinger failed to prove that the charges exceeded such costs.

In any event, we agree with the district court that Schlesinger is not within that class of persons intended to be protected by the regulation.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.