Vasquez v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 1532 (2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Vasquez v. United States, 132 S. Ct. 1532 (2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
9 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Luis Fernandez (ca7, 2019-02-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Luis Fernandez (3×)
7th Cir. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See , e.g. , United States v. Vasquez , 635 F.3d 889 , 895 (7th Cir. 2011), cert. dismissed , 566 U.S. 376 , 132 S.Ct. 1532 , 182 L.Ed.2d 610 (2012).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Luis Fernandez (2×)
7th Cir. · 2019 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Vasquez, 635 F.3d 889, 895 (7th Cir. 2011), cert. dismissed, 566 U.S. 376 , 132 S. Ct. 1532 (2012).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Com. v. Brown, F.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Shoatz, supra at 1220 (suspects’ conduct in dropping suitcases and attempting to flee indicated clear intent to relinquish control of luggage and any expectation of maintaining privacy in its contents); see also U.S. v. Vasquez, 635 F.3d 889, 894 (7th Cir. 2011), cert. dismissed as improvidently granted, 132 S.Ct. 1532 (2012) (suspect, being pursued by police, abandoned car parked in Walmart parking lot, when 5 he left car and ran away); U.S. v. Pittman, 411 F.3d 813, 817 (7th Cir. 2005) (“If the driver of a car flees at the approach of the police, this is pretty good evidence that he�…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Luke v. United States (2×)
D.D.C. · 2013 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Vasquez v. United States, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 1532 , 182 L.Ed.2d 610 (2012); First American Fin.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Vasquez
v.
United States
11-199.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 2, 2012.
132 S. Ct. 1532
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
(Slip Opinion) Cite as: 566 U. S. ____ (2012) 1

Per Curiam

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Wash- ington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press.

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________

No. 11–199 _________________

ALEXANDER VASQUEZ, PETITIONER v. UNITED

STATES

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

[April 2, 2012]

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted. It is so ordered.