green
Positive treatment
5.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1902 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1902
1964
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Opening Private Road Ex Rel. O'Reilly
For example, in Waddell's Appeal, 84 Pa. 90, 93-94 (1877), our Supreme Court stated: The right of the legislature to establish private roads over the land of one man for the benefit of another, for the purpose of access to highways or places of necessary public resort, or even to private ways leading to highways, has never been seriously doubted in Pennsylvania.... [I]t is the connection of these private ways with public highways, or with places of necessary public resort, together with the implied right or license of the public to use them, at least in going to and from the premises of the pe…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
O'Reilly v. Hickory on the Green Homeowners Ass'n
For example, in Waddell’s Appeal, 84 Pa. 90, 93-94 (1877), our Supreme Court stated: The right of the legislature to establish private roads over the land of one man for the benefit of another, for the purpose of access to highways or places of necessary public resort, or even to private ways leading to highways, has never been seriously doubted in Pennsylvania. ... [I]t is the connection of these private ways with public highways, or with places of necessary public resort, together with the implied right or license of the public to use them, at least in going to and from the premises of the…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
In Re Private Road in East Rockhill Tp.
Rejecting the argument that taking for a private road violates the Pennsylvania Constitution, in Waddell's Appeal, 84 Pa. 90, 93-94 (1877), our Supreme Court stated: The right of the legislature to establish private roads over the land of one man for the benefit of another, for the purpose of access to highways or places of necessary public resort, or even to private ways leading to highways, has never been seriously doubted in Pennsylvania. . . . [I]t is the connection of these private ways with public highways, or with places of necessary public resort, together with the implied right or lic…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Henning v. Watanabe
Rejecting the argument that taking for a private road violates the Pennsylvania Constitution, in Waddell’s Appeal, 84 Pa. 90, 93-94 (1877), our Supreme Court stated: The right of the legislature to establish private roads over the land of one man for the benefit of another, for the purpose of access to highways or places of necessary public resort, or even to private ways leading to highways, has never been seriously doubted in Pennsylvania.... [I]t is the connection of these private ways with public highways, or with places of necessary public resort, together with the implied right or lice…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Marinclin v. Urling
As appears in Judge Montgomery’s opinion ( 204 Pa.Super. at p. 555 , 205 A. 2d at p. 886 ): “The rights of the individual involved in these proceedings are not the exclusive consideration. ‘On the contrary, it is the connection of these private ways with public highways, or with places of necessary public resort, together with the implied right or license of the public to use them, at least in going to and from the premises of the person laying them out, quite as much, if not more, as the consideration of purely individual rights, that have won for these acts judicial recognition of' con…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Marinclin Appeal
“On the contrary, it is the connection of these private ways with public highways, or with places of *556 necessary public resort, together with the implied right or license of the public to use them, at least in going to and from the premises of the person laying them out, quite as much, if not more, as the consideration of purely individual rights, that have won for these acts judicial recognition of constitutionality.” Waddell’s Appeal, 84 Pa. 90, 93-94 (1877).
discussed
Cited "see"
Washington Park, Inc. Appeal
(2×)
See Waddell's Appeal, 84 Pa. 90, 93-94 (1877); Pocopson Road, 16 Pa. 15 (1851); Marinclin Appeal, 204 Pa. Superior Ct. 552 , 205 A. 2d 885 (1964); Dickinson Township Road, 23 Pa. Superior Ct. 34 (1903).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Waddell's Appeal
Mar 19, 1877.
E. P. & J. V. Darling, Henry W. Palmer and Steuben Jenldns, for appellants., A. T. McClintock and Henry M. Hoyt, for appellees.
Agnew, Gordon, Mercur, Paxson, Sharswood, Woodward.
most practicable and convenient for making the said way
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered,
Per Curiam.The decree of the court below, continuing the special injunction, is affirmed, with costs to be paid by the appellants, and the appeal is dismissed.