Painewebber Real Est. Sec., Inc. v. D.G. Meyer & Co. & Donald G. Meyer, 9 F.3d 242 (2d Cir. 1993). · Go Syfert
Search
Painewebber Real Est. Sec., Inc. v. D.G. Meyer & Co. & Donald G. Meyer, 9 F.3d 242 (2d Cir. 1993). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
23 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Brill (ohioctapp, 2023-02-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1993 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1993 2009 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Brill
Ohio Ct. App. · 2023 · confidence medium
Id., citing 14 Ohio Jurisprudence 2d 653 et seq., Courts, Section 224 et seq. {¶21} Further, “the highest court of a state ‘has the final word on the meaning of state law.’” County of Westchester, N.Y. v. Commissioner of Transp. of State of Conn., 9 F.3d 242, 245 (2d Cir. 1993), quoting Deeper Life Christian Fellowship, Inc. v. Sobol, 948 F.2d 79, 84 (2d Cir. 1991).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.
2d Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
County of Westchester, 9 F.3d at 245.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Freddie Hamilton v. Beretta
2d Cir. · 2001 · confidence medium
County of Westchester, 9 F.3d at 245. 38 Moreover, it is black-letter law in New York that a plaintiff cannot recover on a negligence claim absent some duty of care owed by defendant to the plaintiff.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Donald S. Engel, Engel & Engel v. Cbs, Inc., Moses & Singer, and Stanley Rothenberg (2×) also: Cited "see"
2d Cir. · 1999 · confidence medium
As we explained in County of Westchester, the state court that follows this course answers “a material subset of’ the general question certified, id. at 247, and its decision controls our resolution of the case.
discussed Cited "see" Craig v. Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.
7th Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
“Certification would be a pointless exercise unless the state court’s answers are regarded as an authoritative and binding statement of state law.... [T]he state answers are binding.” 17A Charles Alan Wright et al., Federal Practice and Procedure Jurisdiction § 4248 (3d ed., updated Apr. 2015); see Cnty. of Westchester, N.Y. v. Comm’r of Transp., 9 F.3d 242 , 246-47 (2d Cir.1993) (rejecting the argument that state supreme court’s decision addressing the particular circumstances of the case was not binding and stating that the decision was dispositive).
cited Cited "see" Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLC
Conn. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Westchester v. Commissioner of Transportation, 9 F.3d 242 , 245 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 511 U.S. 1107 , 114 S. Ct. 2102 , 128 L.
cited Cited "see" County of Westchester v. Town of Greenwich
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See County of Westchester v. Commissioner of Transp., 9 F.3d 242 , 246-47 (2d Cir.1993) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 114 S.Ct. 2102 , 128 L.Ed.2d 664 (1994).
discussed Cited "see" County Of Westchester v. Town Of Greenwich
2d Cir. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See County of Westchester v. Commissioner of Transp., 9 F.3d 242 , 246-47 (2d Cir.1993) (per curiam), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 114 S.Ct. 2102 , 128 L.Ed.2d 664 (1994). 9 Upon remand, Westchester's only remaining claim was that based on a common law public nuisance theory.
cited Cited "see" County of Westchester v. Town of Greenwich
S.D.N.Y. · 1994 · signal: see · confidence high
See County of Westchester v. Commissioner of Transp., 9 F.3d 242, 246-47 (2d Cir.1993).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Painewebber Real Estate Securities, Inc.
v.
D.G. Meyer & Co. And Donald G. Meyer
501.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Nov 9, 1993.
9 F.3d 242
Published

9 F.3d 242

PAINEWEBBER REAL ESTATE SECURITIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
D.G. MEYER & CO. and Donald G. Meyer, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 501, Docket 93-7452.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued Oct. 28, 1993.
Decided Nov. 9, 1993.

George W. Clark, Huntington, NY (Joseph D'Elia, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

George O. Guldi, Westhampton Beach, NY (Thomas T. McVann, of counsel), for defendants-appellees.

Before LUMBARD, VAN GRAAFEILAND and WINTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We affirm for substantially the reasons stated by Judge Wood in the district court. See PaineWebber Real Estate Securities, Inc. v. D.G. Meyer & Co., 835 F.Supp. 116 (1993).