green
Positive treatment
published
8.2 score
Cited for
At page 1084 rejecting argument that the location test was not satisfied where the Coast Guard’s alleged failure to act occurred entirely on land, but the resulting injury occurred on navigable waters, because it “ignore[d] the clear law of [that] circuit that the situs of a tort for the purpose of determining…1 citing case
- Malaysia Shipping v. Sinochem Intl Co, No. 04-1816 (3d Cir. Feb. 7, 2006).published(rejecting argument that the location test was not satisfied where the Coast Guard’s alleged failure to act occurred entirely on land, but the resulting injury occurred on navigable waters, because it “ignore[d] the clea…)
At page 1085 cited at this page1 citing case
- Demacedo v. Koenig, No. 3:19-cv-05815 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 15, 2022).See Gandarela v. Johnson, 286 15 F.3d 1080, 1085 (9th Cir. 2002); Wildman v. Johnson, 261 F.3d 832, 842-43 (9th Cir. 2001). 16 Demacedo makes no arguments regarding cause, and his arguments that he lacked 17 malicious intent and took respo…
Other citing cases
- Pleasant v. State of Washington, No. 2:23-cv-00246 (E.D. Wash. Mar. 31, 2025).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jordan
v.
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty
v.
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty
93-07589.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 4, 1994.
Published opinion
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Jordan
v.
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty[*]
NO. 93-07589
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Feb 04, 1994
[*~1080–1081]1
Appeal From: S.D.Miss.
2
AFFIRMED.
*
Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2