Jordan v. U.S. Fid. & Guar., 15 F.3d 1080 (5th Cir. 1994). · Go Syfert
Jordan v. U.S. Fid. & Guar., 15 F.3d 1080 (5th Cir. 1994). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Malaysia Shipping v. Sinochem Intl Co (ca3, 2006-02-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Malaysia Shipping v. Sinochem Intl Co
3rd Cir. · 2006 · confidence medium
Thus, for a particular class of cases—those with facts similar to The Plymouth—Congress has shifted the focus of the location test from where the injury occurred to where the injury was caused. 14 In Kuehne & Nagle, the Fifth Circuit provided several examples of when the location test is met under the “impact analysis,” stating: This court has applied the “impact” analysis in several 15 F.3d 1080, 1084 (9th Cir. 2005) (rejecting argument that the location test was not satisfied where the Coast Guard’s alleged failure to act occurred entirely on land, but the resulting injury occu…
cited Cited "see" Pleasant v. State of Washington
E.D. Wash. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
ECF No. 27-2 at 4-5; see Liberal, 632 15 F.3d at 1080 (quoting Sharpe, 470 U.S. at 688 ).
discussed Cited "see" Demacedo v. Koenig
N.D. Cal. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Gandarela v. Johnson, 286 15 F.3d 1080, 1085 (9th Cir. 2002); Wildman v. Johnson, 261 F.3d 832, 842-43 (9th Cir. 2001). 16 Demacedo makes no arguments regarding cause, and his arguments that he lacked 17 malicious intent and took responsibility for his actions do not establish that his sentence will 18 impose a fundamental miscarriage of justice.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jordan
v.
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty
93-07589.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 4, 1994.
15 F.3d 1080
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

15 F.3d 1080

Jordan
v.
U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty[*]

NO. 93-07589

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Feb 04, 1994

1

Appeal From: S.D.Miss.

2

AFFIRMED.

*

Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 5th Cir.R. 34.2