green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case ·
…he rehabilitation act covers discrimination claims by an independent contractor.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2011 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2011
2018
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Rochelle Flynn v. Distinctive Home Care, Inc.
(2×)
he rehabilitation act covers discrimination claims by an independent contractor.
discussed
Cited "see"
Urban v. United States
(2×)
See Bank of Guam v. United States, 578 F.3d 1318, 1329 (Fed.Cir.2009), cert. denied, 561 U.S. 1006 , 130 S.Ct. 3468 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2010); Pew Forest Prods, v. United States, 105 Fed.Cl. 59, 66 (2012). 5 There are no genuine issues of material fact as to this point.
discussed
Cited "see"
Lakeshore Engineering Services, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
See Bank of Guam v. United States, 578 F.3d 1318, 1329-30 (Fed.Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3468 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2010); Dairyland Power Coop. v. United States, 16 F.3d 1197, 1202 (Fed.Cir.1994) (citing Atlas Corp. v. United States, 895 F.2d 745, 750 (Fed.Cir.1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 811 , 111 S.Ct. 46 , 112 L.Ed.2d 22 (1990)).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Compliance Solutions Occupational Trainers, Inc. v. United States
(2×)
Nevertheless, the Federal Circuit has reiterated that “[i]n ruling on a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the court must accept as true the complaint’s undisputed factual allegations and should construe them in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Cambridge v. United States, 558 F.3d 1331, 1335 (Fed.Cir.2009); see also Bank of Guam v. United States, 578 F.3d 1318, 1326 (Fed.Cir.2009), cer t. denied, 561 U.S. 1006 , 130 S.Ct. 3468 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2010); Petro-Hunt, LLC v. United States, 90 Fed.Cl. 51, 68 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Frankel v. United States
(2×)
Nevertheless, the Federal Circuit has reiterated that “[i]n ruling on a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the court must accept as true the complaint’s undisputed *335 factual allegations and should construe them in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Cambridge v. United States, 558 F.3d 1331, 1335 (Fed.Cir.2009); see also Bank of Guam v. United States, 578 F.3d 1318, 1326 (Fed.Cir.2009), cer t. denied, 561 U.S. 1006 , 130 S.Ct. 3468 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2010); Petro-Hunt, LLC v. United States, 90 Fed.Cl. 51, 68 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dennis J. Quebedeaux, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated Persons and Entities v. United States
(2×)
Nevertheless, the Federal Circuit has reiterated that “[i]n ruling on a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the court must accept as true the complaint’s undisputed factual allegations and should construe them in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Cambridge v. United States, 558 F.3d 1331, 1335 (Fed.Cir.2009); see also Bank of Guam v. United States, 578 F.3d 1318, 1326 (Fed.Cir.2009), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3468 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2010); Petro-Hunt, LLC v. United States, 90 Fed.Cl. 51, 68 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ambrose v. United States
(2×)
Nevertheless, the Federal Circuit has reiterated that “[i]n ruling on a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the court must accept as true the complaint’s undisputed factual allegations and should construe them in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Cambridge v. United States, 558 F.3d 1331, 1335 (Fed.Cir.2009); see also Bank of Guam v. United States, 578 F.3d 1318, 1326 (Fed.Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3468 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2010); Petro-Hunt, LLC v. United States, 90 Fed.Cl. 51, 68 (2009).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Normandy Apartments, Ltd. v. United States
(2×)
Nevertheless, the Federal Circuit has recently reiterated that “[i]n ruling on a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the court must accept as true the complaint’s undisputed factual allegations and should construe them in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Cambridge v. United States, 558 F.3d 1331, 1335 (Fed.Cir.2009); see also Bank of Guam v. United States, 578 F.3d 1318, 1326 (Fed.Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 3468 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2010); Petro-Hunt, 90 Fed.Cl. at 68 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Klamath Tribe Claims Committee v. United States
(2×)
Nevertheless, the Federal Circuit has recently reiterated that “[i]n ruling on a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the court must accept as true the complaint’s undisputed factual allegations and should construe them in a light most favorable to the plaintiff.” Cambridge v. United States, 558 F.3d 1331, 1335 (Fed.Cir.2009); see also Bank of Guam v. United States, 578 F.3d 1318, 1326 (Fed.Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3468 , 177 L.Ed.2d 1056 (2010); Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United States, 90 Fed.Cl. 51, 68 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
BANK OF GUAM
v.
UNITED STATES
v.
UNITED STATES
No. 09-1140.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 21, 2010.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (2)
Case below, 578 F.3d 1318.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.