Ingalls v. AES Corp., 176 L. Ed. 2d 179 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Ingalls v. AES Corp., 176 L. Ed. 2d 179 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 4× by 2 distinct cases · …an appellate court will affirm a correct judgment on any applicable theory. ⚠ not in text
38 citation events (35 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: IN THE MATTER OF M.K.T. (okla, 2016-01-20)
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) IN THE MATTER OF M.K.T. (3×)
Okla. · 2016 · quote attribution · 3 verbatim quotes · confidence low
an appellate court will affirm a correct judgment on any applicable theory.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Pigg
Okla. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
an appellate court will affirm a correct judgment on any applicable theory.
examined Cited "see" People v. McCarty (4×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Colo. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally United States v. McCane, 573 F.3d 1037, 1041-45 (10th Cir.2009) (holding that the good-faith exception applies where officers relied on circuit's erroneous pre- Gant jurisprudence), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010); United States v. Davis, 598 F.3d 1259, 1264 (11th Cir.2010) (same); People v. Key, No. 07CA1257, ___ P.3d ___, ___, 2010 WL 961646 , at *2 (Colo.App.
discussed Cited "see" UNITED STATES of America v. Ricardo GONZALEZ
unknown court · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. McCane, 573 F.3d 1037 (10th Cir.2009), cert. denied, No. 09-402, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 179 , 78 U.S.L.W. 3221 (Mar. 1, 2010); United States v. Jackson, 825 F.2d 853 (5th Cir.1987) (en banc).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Marzzarella
3rd Cir. · 2010 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare United States v. Scroggins, 599 F.3d 433, 451 (5th Cir.2010) (characterizing this language as dicta), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. June 1, 2010) (09-11204), and United States v. McCane, 573 F.3d 1037, 1047 (10th Cir.2009) (Tymkovich, J., dissenting) (same), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1686 , 176 L.Ed.2d 179 (2010) with United States v. Rozier, 598 F.3d 768 , 771 n. 6 (11th Cir.2010) (stating this language is not dicta), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 3399 , 177 L.Ed.2d 313 (2010), and United States v. Vongxay, 594 F.3d 1111, 1115 (9th Cir.2010) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Dwane Ingalls
v.
The AES Corporation
No. 09-8512.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 1, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 179
Published
1 passages pin-cited by 2 cases
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: Supreme Court of Oklahoma (4)

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 22, 2010, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.