McCray v. Francis Howell Sch. Dist., 176 L. Ed. 2d 387 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
McCray v. Francis Howell Sch. Dist., 176 L. Ed. 2d 387 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
15 citation events (15 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Monique Calhoun (ca8, 2013-07-24)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" United States v. Monique Calhoun
8th Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Jenkins-Watts, 574 F.3d 950, 959 (8th Cir.2009), cert. denied, *600 559 U.S. 1019 , 130 S.Ct. 1915 , 176 L.Ed.2d 387 (2010) (standard of review).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Andres Jaimes
5th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Rose, 587 F.3d 695, 702 (5th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1915 , 176 L.Ed.2d 387 (2010).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Pablo
10th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Sykes v. United States, 373 F.2d 607, 613 (5th Cir.1966) (explaining that appellate courts are “not equipped for divination” and “[t]hat which is not visible cannot be ‘plain.’ ”); see also United States v. Rose, 587 F.3d 695, 700-01 (5th Cir.2009) (finding no plain error where supervising lab analyst relayed to the jury some out-of-court statement contained in a drug analysis report she did not perform because there were factual ambiguities regarding the supervisor’s role in, and personal knowledge of, the testing and report), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1915 , 176 L…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." United States v. Pablo (2×)
10th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Sykes v. United States, 373 F.2d 607, 613 (5th Cir.1966) (explaining that appellate courts are “not equipped for divination” and “[t]hat which is not visible cannot be ‘plain.’ ”); see also United States v. Rose, 587 F.3d 695, 700-01 (5th Cir.2009) (finding no plain error where supervising lab analyst relayed to the jury some testimonial hearsay contained in a drug analysis report she did not perform because there were factual ambiguities regarding the supervisor’s role in, and personal knowledge of, the testing and report) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1915 , 176 L.Ed.…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Shelton v. Kennedy Funding, Inc.
8th Cir. · 2010 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., United States v. Jenkins-Watts, 574 F.3d 950, 964 (8th Cir.2009), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1915 , 176 L.Ed.2d 387 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Elizabeth McCray
v.
Francis Howell School District
No. 09-8976.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 387
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.