In re Prudhomme, 176 L. Ed. 2d 405 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
In re Prudhomme, 176 L. Ed. 2d 405 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“tate-court factual determination is not unreasonable merely because the federal habeas court would have reached a different conclusion in the first instance.”
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Morgan v. Hardy (ca7, 2011-11-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Morgan v. Hardy
7th Cir. · 2011 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
tate-court factual determination is not unreasonable merely because the federal habeas court would have reached a different conclusion in the first instance.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Roderick Troy Prudhomme
No. 09-9056.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 22, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 405
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 73%
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (1)

Petition for writ of habeas corpus denied.