Holt v. Minnesota, 176 L. Ed. 2d 423 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Holt v. Minnesota, 176 L. Ed. 2d 423 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: James Head v. Eric Wilson (cadc, 2015-06-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" James Head v. Eric Wilson
D.C. Cir. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Martinez, 559 U.S. 1042 , 130 S.Ct. 2073 , 176 L.Ed.2d 423 (2010) (mem.).
discussed Cited "see" Johnson v. Wilson
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
Code § 23-110 (g); see Williams v. Martinez, 586 F.3d 995, 998 (D.C.Cir.2009) (“Section 23-110(g)’s plain language makes clear that it only divests federal courts of jurisdiction to hear habe-as petitions by prisoners who could have raised viable claims pursuant to section 23-110(a).”), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1042 , 130 S.Ct. 2073 , 176 L.Ed.2d 423 (2010); Byrd v. Henderson, 119 F.3d 34, 36 (D.C.Cir.1997) (per curiam) (finding that “a District of Columbia prisoner has no recourse to a federal judicial forum unless the local remedy is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of h…
discussed Cited "see" Saunder, Jr. v. United States
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
Code § 23-110 (g); see Williams v. Martinez, 586 F.3d 995, 998 (D.C.Cir.2009) (“Section 23-110(g)’s plain language makes 'clear that it only divests federal courts of jurisdiction to hear habeas petitions by prisoners who could have raised viable claims pursuant to section 23-110(a).”), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 1042 , 130 S.Ct. 2073 , 176 L.Ed.2d 423 (2010).
discussed Cited "see" Richardson v. United States
D.D.C. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
Although habeas relief in federal court may be available to a District of Columbia Code offender who “is in custody in violation of the Constitution ... of the United States,” 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (c)(3), his habeas petition “shall not be entertained by ... any Federal ... court if it appears that the [prisoner] has failed to make a motion for relief under [D.C.Code § 23-110] or that the Superior Court has denied him relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention.” 3 D.C.Code § 23—110(g); see Williams v. Mart…
cited Cited "see" Peete v. United States of America
D.D.C. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Williams v. Martinez, 586 F.3d 995, 998-99 (D.C.Cir.2009), ce rt. denied, 559 U.S. 1042 , 130 S.Ct. *54 2073, 176 L.Ed.2d 423 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clarence Allen Holt
v.
Minnesota
No. 09-9108.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 29, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 423
Published

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Minnesota denied.

Same case below, 772 N.W.2d 470.