Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int'l, Inc., 176 L. Ed. 2d 726 (2010). · Go Syfert
Search
Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int'l, Inc., 176 L. Ed. 2d 726 (2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2010 · …martin raises several potential errors that the district court made in admitting the 1980 conviction, but we need not address them. assuming that the district court erred in admitting the conviction, that error was harmless. ⚠ not in text
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: United States v. Alvarado Perez (ca4, 2010-07-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) United States v. Alvarado Perez (2×)
4th Cir. · 2010 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
martin raises several potential errors that the district court made in admitting the 1980 conviction, but we need not address them. assuming that the district court erred in admitting the conviction, that error was harmless.
cited Cited "see" Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter International, Inc.
Fed. Cir. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Fresenius USA, Inc. v. Baxter Int’l, Inc., 559 U.S. 1070 , 130 S.Ct. 2120 , 176 L.Ed.2d 726 (2010).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Fresenius USA, Inc.
v.
Baxter International, Inc.
No. 09-1096.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 19, 2010.
176 L. Ed. 2d 726
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 66%
Citer courts: Fourth Circuit (2)

Petition for writ of cer-tiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.

[*727] Same case below, 582 F.3d 1288.